Core Viewpoint - The recent admission policy adjustment by Qingyuan City aims to retain quality student resources and promote the development of county-level high schools, specifically by prohibiting the enrollment of students from Lianzhou in Qingyuan's top high schools [5][8][32]. Group 1: Admission Policy Changes - Qingyuan City First High School will no longer enroll students from Lianzhou, marking a significant shift in its admission strategy [5][11][12]. - Other public and private high schools in Qingyuan will also restrict enrollment to students from Qingcheng District and Qingxin District, effectively excluding Lianzhou students from public funding classes [6][25][51]. - This policy is part of a broader initiative to revitalize county-level education by ensuring that quality student resources remain within local schools [8][32][59]. Group 2: Impact on Students and Families - The policy change has left many Lianzhou students, who previously aimed for Qingyuan First High School, with limited options, as they can now only attend local high schools [7][18][27]. - Parents express concerns about the quality of education available in Lianzhou, with some considering moving their children to urban areas for better educational opportunities [53][55]. - The adjustment has sparked discussions about whether local schools can provide the same quality of education as those in urban areas, raising questions about the effectiveness of the policy [59][90]. Group 3: Broader Educational Context - The policy aligns with a provincial initiative to retain quality student resources in county-level schools, addressing the issue of "county school collapse" due to student outflow [30][41][84]. - Similar policies have been adopted in other cities in Guangdong, indicating a regional trend towards restricting enrollment from surrounding areas to bolster local education [75][76]. - The introduction of new schools, such as the Guangzhou No. 6 Experimental School in Lianzhou, aims to provide quality education locally, but parents remain cautious about its long-term effectiveness [66][70].