Group 1 - The Australian government's youth social media ban aims to protect minors under 16 from harmful online content, but it highlights the government's inability to effectively manage internet governance and social issues, relying instead on a one-size-fits-all approach to cater to political interests [1][2] - The ban may inadvertently push youth towards more hidden and unregulated "underground" channels for social interaction, which could pose greater risks in terms of data privacy and harmful content compared to established social media platforms [2] - Effective internet governance for minors requires a comprehensive approach that includes digital literacy education, algorithm improvement, and community involvement, rather than simplistic bans that contradict educational principles [2][4] Group 2 - In contrast to Western countries, China's internet governance has been recognized for its effective solutions that balance development and protection, such as the implementation of the "Minor Internet Protection Regulations" which clearly define aspects of online safety for minors [3] - China's approach includes a "minor mode" that limits usage time and sets age-appropriate content, demonstrating a combination of effective market practices and proactive government involvement, showcasing a sophisticated governance model [3] - The focus should be on guiding minors to understand the internet as a regulated space rather than imposing blanket bans, emphasizing the need for refined governance that combines digital literacy and risk management [4]