Core Insights - Zhihu is increasingly becoming a major platform for discussions on cutting-edge scientific technology, having initiated a discussion on the theme of "AI Paradigm Shift in Research" in collaboration with several institutions [1][2] - The discussion is led by prominent experts, including three recipients of the "2025 World Top Scientists Association Award," highlighting the platform's commitment to fostering scientific dialogue [1] - The initiative aims to establish Zhihu as a scientific discussion community, bridging the gap between the public and scientific discourse, particularly during the "2025 Science Season" launched in September [1] Group 1 - The "AI Paradigm Shift in Research" discussion has attracted significant participation from researchers and enthusiasts, indicating a strong interest in the topic [2] - Optimistic sentiments were expressed by participants regarding AI's potential to revolutionize mathematical research, with one contributor suggesting it could lead to a new field of data science mathematics [2] - However, there are concerns about the exaggerated capabilities of AI, as demonstrated by a recent case where researchers used GPT-5 to address complex mathematical problems, which was later revealed to be a retrieval of existing research rather than original proof [2]

Core Insights - Zhihu is increasingly becoming a major discussion platform for cutting-edge scientific technology, collaborating with various institutions to promote discussions on the theme of research transformation in the AI era [1][2] - The "2025 Science Season" launched by Zhihu aims to establish a scientific discussion community and facilitate dialogue between the public and science [1] Group 1: AI Research Paradigm - The "AI Research New Paradigm" discussion has attracted significant participation from researchers and enthusiasts, with optimistic views on AI's potential to revolutionize mathematics and data science [2] - However, there are concerns regarding the actual capabilities of AI, as demonstrated by a case where GPT-5 was found to have merely retrieved existing research rather than providing independent proofs [2] - Experts suggest that AI is not replacing human intellect but rather serving as a powerful collaborator in the research process [2] Group 2: Importance of Basic Science - Wes Sandquist posed a question about the role of basic science in advancing human health and industrial development, prompting diverse responses highlighting its critical importance [3] - The analogy of basic science as providing "sensors" and "system models" for societal development emphasizes its foundational role in technological advancements [3] - Scott Emmer's inquiry into the ESCRT complex's role in neurons sparked interdisciplinary discussions, showcasing the vitality of cross-disciplinary communication [3] Group 3: Work-Life Balance in Research - The discussion on balancing research and personal life resonated widely, with insights into the reputation-driven nature of research careers affecting work-life boundaries [3]