Core Insights - The emergence of DeepSeek, a domestic open-source AI model, has sparked discussions due to its free advantages, yet many still prefer to pay for ChatGPT, raising questions about user preferences and the quality of AI outputs [1][60]. - The output quality of AI tools is significantly influenced by user interaction, with 70% of the output quality depending on how users design their prompts [4][25]. Technical Differences - DeepSeek utilizes a mixed expert model with a training cost of $5.5 million, making it a cost-effective alternative compared to ChatGPT, which has training costs in the hundreds of millions [2]. - In the Chatbot Arena test, DeepSeek ranked third, demonstrating competitive performance, particularly excelling in mathematical reasoning with a 97.3% accuracy rate in the MATH-500 test [2]. Performance in Specific Scenarios - DeepSeek has shown superior performance in detailed analyses and creative writing tasks, providing comprehensive insights and deep thinking capabilities [3][17]. - The model's reasoning process is more transparent but requires structured prompts for optimal use, indicating that user guidance is crucial for maximizing its potential [7][12]. Cost and Efficiency - DeepSeek's pricing is 30% lower than ChatGPT, with a processing efficiency that is 20% higher and energy consumption reduced by 25% [8][9]. - For enterprises, private deployment of DeepSeek can be cost-effective in the long run, with a one-time server investment of around $200,000, avoiding ongoing API fees [9][10]. Deployment Flexibility - DeepSeek offers flexibility in deployment, allowing individual developers to run the 7B model on standard hardware, while enterprise setups can support high concurrency [11][10]. - The model's ability to run on lightweight devices significantly lowers the barrier for AI application [11]. Advanced Prompting Techniques - Mastery of advanced prompting techniques, such as "prompt chaining" and "reverse thinking," can significantly enhance the effectiveness of DeepSeek [13][14]. - The model's performance can be optimized by using multi-role prompts, allowing it to balance professionalism and readability [15][16]. Language Processing Capabilities - DeepSeek demonstrates a 92.7% accuracy rate in Chinese semantic understanding, surpassing ChatGPT's 89.3%, and supports classical literature analysis and dialect recognition [17]. Industry Applications - In finance, DeepSeek has improved investment decision efficiency by 40% for a securities company [18]. - In the medical field, it has achieved an 85% accuracy rate in disease diagnosis, nearing the level of professional doctors [19]. - For programming assistance, DeepSeek's error rate is 23% lower than GPT-4.5, with a 40% faster response time [20]. Complementary Nature of AI Tools - DeepSeek and ChatGPT are not mutually exclusive but serve as complementary tools, each suited for different tasks based on user needs [21][22]. - DeepSeek is preferable for deep reasoning, specialized knowledge, and data privacy, while ChatGPT excels in multi-modal interaction and creative content generation [24][22]. Importance of Prompting Skills - The ability to design effective prompts is becoming a core competency in the AI era, influencing the quality of AI outputs [54][55]. - The book "DeepSeek Application Advanced Tutorial" aims to enhance users' prompting skills and unlock the model's full potential [61].

欧佩克联盟上周六（5月31日）决定7月每日大幅增产41.1万桶，以夺回市场份额并惩罚超产成员国如伊 拉克、哈萨克斯坦。此举在意料之中，表明该组织事实上的领导者沙特的石油政策发生了显著转变，从 限产保价转向增产保额。邓正红软实力表示，鉴于此前有关欧佩克联盟将超预期的传闻导致油价跳水， 最新的增产公告令市场松了一口气，石油软实力盘整向上，周一（6月2日）开盘，WTI原油迅速拉涨， 日内涨幅一度扩大至2%。 运用邓正红软实力思想分析，欧佩克联盟特别是沙特主导下的连续增产决策是一次资源整合力、战略影 响力、环境适应力协同作用的集中展现。对内强化纪律约束，惩罚超产，对外主动争夺份额，挤压页岩 油，彰显资源导向型竞争软实力。通过精准的预期管理如渐进释放信号、避免超预期等和强调基本面如 低库存、需求稳，成功将"增产利空"转化为"信心利好"，体现了高超的战略沟通影响力和对定价权的维 护。敏锐适应特朗普政府的政治压力、全球经济动荡如关税战等带来的窗口期、夏季季节性需求高峰以 及成员国实际产能约束，展现了极强的环境适应力。沙特国内经济多元化的进展也为其政策提供了更大 灵活性。 因此，"石油软实力盘整向上"的实质是市场对欧佩克联盟 ...