Core Viewpoint - The article highlights the life and contributions of Zhou Haoran, a revolutionary figure and martyr in the fight against Japanese aggression in the 1930s, emphasizing his literary talent, commitment to social justice, and ultimate sacrifice for his country [3][17]. Background and Early Life - Zhou Haoran, originally named Zhou Shichao, was born in 1915 in Wago Village, Jimo. His father, Zhou Fuxian, was a respected lawyer in Qingdao [4]. - Demonstrating exceptional intelligence from a young age, Zhou excelled in his studies and was recognized by his teachers [4][5]. Literary Contributions and Ideological Development - Zhou Haoran was passionate about literature and social issues, expressing his desire to contribute to society through his writings [5]. - He was influenced by new cultural ideas and began to embrace Marxism and revolutionary literature during his time at Shandong University [9][10]. Involvement in Revolutionary Activities - In April 1930, Zhou joined the "Left Alliance" in Qingdao, engaging in anti-Japanese propaganda and cultural activities [9][10]. - He co-founded the "Whistle Literary Society" and contributed to the publication of the "Whistle" magazine, which aimed to inspire the public against oppression [11][12]. Military Engagement and Sacrifice - With the outbreak of the full-scale war in 1937, Zhou Haoran interrupted his studies to join the fight against Japanese invaders, emphasizing his patriotic duty [13][14]. - He organized local youth into a resistance group and led successful operations against Japanese forces, marking significant victories in the region [14][15]. - Zhou was eventually captured and killed in 1939 at the age of 24, becoming a symbol of resistance and sacrifice for his country [16][17].

Core Viewpoint - The conference commemorating the 110th anniversary of the publication of "New Youth" highlights the significance of "New Culture" and "New Literature" in shaping modern Chinese thought and literature, emphasizing the need for a comprehensive understanding of their historical richness and contemporary relevance [1][3][20]. Group 1: Conference Overview - The event was organized by Zhejiang University and the Zhejiang Provincial Modern Literature Research Association, featuring over 60 scholars from various institutions, including Peking University and Waseda University [1][3]. - Keynote speeches emphasized the role of Zhejiang in the New Culture Movement, noting its contribution to modern literature and the importance of "New Youth" in promoting ideological enlightenment and literary revolution [3][4][5]. Group 2: Historical Context and Contributions - The conference discussed the historical contributions of figures like Lu Xun and Mao Dun, highlighting Zhejiang's role as a birthplace for significant literary and ideological developments [4][5]. - The importance of "New Youth" in fostering a dialogue between traditional and modern cultural elements was underscored, with discussions on its impact on Marxism's dissemination in China [3][5]. Group 3: Thematic Reports - Scholars presented diverse perspectives on the complexities of "New Culture" and "New Literature," addressing issues such as the relationship between modern literature and political enlightenment [7][9]. - The reports explored the modernity of "New Literature," tracing its roots to various historical influences, including shifts in values and the evolution of language [9][10]. Group 4: Regional and Cultural Dynamics - The discussions included the regional characteristics of the New Culture Movement, with scholars analyzing the cultural traits of Jiangnan and the impact of local education practices [15]. - The interaction between Chinese modern literature and Southeast Asian literature was examined, revealing mutual influences and the emergence of new literary forms [13]. Group 5: Methodological Innovations - The conference showcased innovative methodologies in literary research, emphasizing the importance of historical context and interdisciplinary approaches [18][20]. - Scholars advocated for a nuanced understanding of the New Culture Movement, distinguishing it from the May Fourth Movement to clarify their distinct historical trajectories [12][14].