新能源车购置税免征政策

Search documents
汽车视点 | “期中考”放榜:高增长难掩焦虑,仅5家车企销量完成率“达标”
Xin Hua Cai Jing· 2025-07-02 08:31
Core Insights - The automotive market in China has shown significant changes in the first half of 2025, with various brands reporting their sales performance, indicating a competitive landscape shift [1][2]. Sales Performance - Five brands have doubled their sales, while five companies met their sales targets. Overall, the sales performance of 28 major automotive brands was positive, with only five companies reporting a year-on-year decline [2][5]. - Notable performers include BYD with 382,600 units sold in June, a 212% increase year-on-year, and a total of 2,146,000 units in the first half, reflecting a 33.04% growth [3][7]. - Geely's sales reached 236,000 units in June, a 42% increase year-on-year, with a total of over 1,409,200 units in the first half, marking a 47% growth [5]. Brand Highlights - New energy vehicle brands like Hongmeng Zhixing and Xiaopeng Motors have shown strong growth, with Hongmeng Zhixing reclaiming the monthly sales crown among new forces with 52,700 units delivered in June [6][7]. - Li Auto and NIO have faced challenges, with Li Auto achieving only about 30% of its annual sales target, while NIO's performance has been average despite maintaining a growth trend [8][9]. Market Trends - The market for economic models is leading, while high-end vehicle growth is slowing down. The sales of high-end new energy vehicles have not kept pace with the overall market growth due to fewer significant new releases [10][11]. - Analysts predict that the overall automotive market will see a growth of 4.7% in 2025, with new energy vehicle sales expected to reach 16.7 million units, a 30% increase year-on-year [11]. Future Outlook - The second half of 2025 is expected to benefit from policies promoting vehicle trade-ins and the anticipated end of the new energy vehicle purchase tax exemption, leading to higher sales expectations [11]. - Analysts remain optimistic about the high-end new energy vehicle market, citing unmet demand and a lack of quality supply in certain price segments [11].