Group 1 - The core viewpoint is that Japan's Prime Minister Fumio Kishida's remarks regarding Taiwan are seen as a betrayal of diplomatic integrity and a violation of international law, with calls for strong condemnation of such statements [1][2] - The principle of "One China" is emphasized as a fundamental consensus for maintaining peace in East Asia and the world, with Japan having no authority to interfere with it [1] - The historical context of Japan's militaristic past is highlighted, suggesting that Japan should reflect deeply on its history of aggression in East Asia [1] Group 2 - The resurgence of Japanese militarism is viewed as a dangerous delusion that could lead to disaster for Japan's future, pushing youth towards conflict and harming innocent civilians [2] - The rise of extreme right-wing behavior in Japan is linked to a deep sense of crisis regarding China's rise and a prolonged economic stagnation, leading to a loss of hope [2] - Kishida's provocations are interpreted as politically motivated actions to rally support from right-wing and centrist factions, which could ultimately harm national interests [2] Group 3 - The ongoing tensions in East Asia are attributed to long-standing issues stemming from U.S. policies, with Kishida's actions exacerbating the situation [3] - A call for Japan to recognize the current realities and abandon unrealistic ambitions is made, advocating for a peaceful East Asia and a better quality of life for its citizens [3]