Workflow
星巴克中国业务出售
icon
Search documents
星巴克,还会降价吗?丨消费参考+
Core Viewpoint - Starbucks China is undergoing significant changes following the sale of a 60% stake to Boyu Capital, raising questions about its future direction and pricing strategy [3][4][10]. Group 1: Sale Details - Starbucks will form a joint venture with Boyu Capital to operate its retail business in China, with Boyu holding up to 60% equity and Starbucks retaining 40% [3]. - The joint venture is valued at approximately 28.49 billion RMB (4 billion USD) [3]. - This sale indicates Starbucks is relinquishing core decision-making power in its Chinese retail operations [3][4]. Group 2: Market Position and Performance - Starbucks China is losing market dominance compared to competitors like Luckin Coffee, which reported a 47.1% year-on-year revenue growth to 12.36 billion RMB, while Starbucks China saw only an 8% increase to 7.9 billion USD (approximately 5.63 billion RMB) [4]. - Luckin has over 26,000 stores, while Starbucks China has only 8,000, highlighting a significant gap in market presence [5]. Group 3: Strategic Changes - Starbucks is shifting towards empowering its Chinese team, which has led to a 6% year-on-year revenue increase to 8.316 billion USD (approximately 5.91 billion RMB) in Q3, despite a 7% decline in average transaction value [7][8]. - The introduction of local shareholders represents a higher level of operational autonomy for Starbucks China [8]. Group 4: Future Expansion Plans - Starbucks aims to expand its store count in China to 20,000, which would require a significant adjustment in its pricing strategy to remain competitive in lower-tier markets [10][11]. - The feasibility of maintaining a mid-to-high-end positioning while expanding to 20,000 stores is uncertain [16][17]. Group 5: Operational Considerations - Starbucks' operational costs are higher than those of competitors like Luckin and Kudi, making substantial price reductions challenging [13][15]. - The company’s commitment to employee welfare and service quality may limit its ability to lower prices significantly [14][18]. Group 6: Overall Implications - The changes at Starbucks China suggest a potential shift in its operational model, with an emphasis on adapting to the competitive landscape while maintaining service quality [19][20].