机器人应用于工厂

Search documents
制造业,拒绝双足机器人 | 海斌访谈
Di Yi Cai Jing· 2025-09-27 13:01
Core Viewpoint - The consensus is forming that bipedal humanoid robots are not suitable for factory environments due to high energy consumption and slower movement speed compared to wheeled robots [1][10]. Group 1: Robot Types and Applications - Wheeled robots are currently more adaptable to factory settings, while bipedal robots are primarily used for exhibition purposes [2][4]. - New Times Da has deployed a humanoid robot at Haier's Chongqing refrigerator factory, focusing on upgrading robot control technology and data collection for training new generation robots [4][5]. - Puzhi Robotics has shipped 200 robots, with 60% being wheeled and 40% bipedal, indicating a preference for wheeled robots in industrial applications [4][5]. Group 2: Cost and Efficiency - The development cost of bipedal robots is significantly higher due to increased complexity and the need for more sensors, with prices ranging from 500,000 to 600,000 yuan, while wheeled robots cost between 400,000 and 450,000 yuan [5][8]. - Bipedal robots consume 40% of their energy for movement, leading to inefficiencies in factory settings where speed and energy efficiency are critical [10]. Group 3: Performance and Limitations - Bipedal robots have a movement speed of approximately 1.3 meters per second, while wheeled robots can reach 2.5 meters per second, making them less suitable for high-paced industrial environments [8][9]. - The operational endurance of bipedal robots is limited to 2-3 hours under full load, compared to 4-5 hours for wheeled robots, further impacting their utility in factories [9][10]. Group 4: Future Outlook - Experts express a mixed outlook on the future of bipedal robots in factories, with some believing that technological advancements could eventually allow them to replace wheeled robots [12][13]. - The development of humanoid robots is seen as a long-term goal, with significant challenges remaining in terms of safety, technical feasibility, and economic value [13].