Core Points - The article emphasizes the importance of enhancing the supervision system of the Party and the state, focusing on the integration and coordination of various supervisory mechanisms to improve overall effectiveness [4][5][6][7][8][9]. Group 1: Supervision Mechanisms - The article discusses the continuous improvement of various supervisory mechanisms, including audit, statistics, and financial oversight, to form a cohesive supervisory force [2][13]. - It highlights the role of big data and information technology in enhancing the quality and effectiveness of specialized supervision [4][11]. - The need for a unified leadership and comprehensive coverage in the supervision system is stressed, with a focus on the Party's leading role [5][8][12]. Group 2: Party's Self-Supervision - The article outlines the necessity of self-supervision within the Party, emphasizing the integration of internal supervision with external oversight mechanisms [6][9][10]. - It mentions the importance of the Party's self-revolution and the enhancement of internal supervision systems to ensure accountability and transparency [7][11][16]. - The article notes that the Party's internal supervision is considered the primary form of oversight, with a call for comprehensive coverage through various supervisory bodies [9][16]. Group 3: Implementation and Coordination - The article describes the ongoing efforts to deepen the reform of the disciplinary inspection and supervision system, aiming for effective coordination among different supervisory entities [11][12][15]. - It highlights specific examples of local supervisory bodies implementing coordinated mechanisms to enhance oversight efficiency [13][14]. - The article emphasizes the importance of integrating supervision into the broader governance framework to ensure effective implementation of policies and accountability [15][17].

Group 1 - The core viewpoint emphasizes the integration of anti-corruption and discipline enforcement, advocating for a systematic approach to address both misconduct and corruption simultaneously [1][2] - The need to break away from fragmented governance models and implement a comprehensive strategy targeting both common and individual issues is highlighted [3][4] - The establishment of a robust supervisory system that coordinates various forms of oversight is essential for enhancing the effectiveness of anti-corruption efforts [2][5] Group 2 - The article stresses the importance of a clear responsibility transmission mechanism to ensure accountability at all levels of governance [4][5] - It discusses the necessity of integrating anti-corruption measures into broader political and administrative frameworks to enhance governance efficiency [3][4] - The focus on leveraging data and technology to improve the detection and prevention of corruption is underscored, aiming for a proactive rather than reactive approach [2][5]