会议指出，要深入学习贯彻习近平总书记关于加强党的作风建设的重要论述，锲而不舍落实中央八 项规定精神，持之以恒推进全面从严治党，以彻底的自我革命精神将作风建设进行到底。保持清醒警 省，坚持问题导向，以钉钉子精神真抓实改、深化整改，巩固拓展学习教育成果，坚持不懈推进作风建 设常态化长效化。坚持一严到底，把严的基调贯穿党的建设全过程各方面，对干部队伍从严教育、从严 管理、从严监督。以改革精神堵漏建制，健全授权用权制权相统一、清晰透明可追溯的制度机制，不断 扎紧制度笼子。严格执行制度，从严监督执纪，将硬要求变为硬举措，让铁规矩长出铁牙齿。注重抓早 抓小，始终把纪律和规矩挺在前面，坚持纪严于法、纪在法前，用好监督执纪"四种形态"。加强教育引 导，深化新时代廉洁文化建设，常态化开展作风教育、纪律教育，强化警示教育，引导党员干部传承红 色基因，自觉锤炼党性。要坚定不移开展反腐败斗争，深化风腐同查同治，以铁腕反腐的强大意志和决 心，保持利剑高悬、震慑常在，一步不停歇、半步不退让，坚决打好攻坚战、持久战。 会议强调，抓好作风建设，必须强化监督，把党内监督和人民监督结合起来。要着力提升党内监督 穿透力和有效性，重视发挥群众监督、 ...

习近平总书记在二十届中央纪委四次全会上强调，要强化全面从严治党主体责任和监督责任。党委要主 动抓、主动管，纪委要把专责监督履行好，聚焦主责、干好主业，各责任主体都要知责、担责、履责。 强化全面从严治党政治责任，是以习近平同志为核心的党中央提出的重要要求，是推进全面从严治党的 关键举措。中央纪委国家监委驻生态环境部纪检监察组全面贯彻习近平总书记重要讲话精神，认真履行 监督责任，压实驻在单位主体责任，以"两个责任"深度交融，持续推进生态文明建设，厚植高质量发展 的绿色底色。 立足监督职责定位，准确把握派驻纪检监察机构履行监督责任的内涵 纪检监察机关是党内监督和国家监察专责机关，派驻纪检监察机构作为派出机关的重要组成部分，是纪 检监察机关履行监督专责的重要力量，要坚决扛起监督责任，将派驻优势转化为监督效能。 强化监督是党章赋予派驻纪检监察机构的重要职责。党章明确规定，强化全面从严治党主体责任和监督 责任，加强对党的领导机关和党员领导干部特别是主要领导干部的监督，不断完善党内监督体系。同 时，明确纪委是党内监督专责机关，主要任务是维护党的章程和其他党内法规等方面工作，明确派驻机 构工作必须受到驻在单位的支持。派驻机构 ...

Core Points - The article emphasizes the importance of enhancing the supervision system of the Party and the state, focusing on the integration and coordination of various supervisory mechanisms to improve overall effectiveness [4][5][6][7][8][9]. Group 1: Supervision Mechanisms - The article discusses the continuous improvement of various supervisory mechanisms, including audit, statistics, and financial oversight, to form a cohesive supervisory force [2][13]. - It highlights the role of big data and information technology in enhancing the quality and effectiveness of specialized supervision [4][11]. - The need for a unified leadership and comprehensive coverage in the supervision system is stressed, with a focus on the Party's leading role [5][8][12]. Group 2: Party's Self-Supervision - The article outlines the necessity of self-supervision within the Party, emphasizing the integration of internal supervision with external oversight mechanisms [6][9][10]. - It mentions the importance of the Party's self-revolution and the enhancement of internal supervision systems to ensure accountability and transparency [7][11][16]. - The article notes that the Party's internal supervision is considered the primary form of oversight, with a call for comprehensive coverage through various supervisory bodies [9][16]. Group 3: Implementation and Coordination - The article describes the ongoing efforts to deepen the reform of the disciplinary inspection and supervision system, aiming for effective coordination among different supervisory entities [11][12][15]. - It highlights specific examples of local supervisory bodies implementing coordinated mechanisms to enhance oversight efficiency [13][14]. - The article emphasizes the importance of integrating supervision into the broader governance framework to ensure effective implementation of policies and accountability [15][17].

Group 1 - The core viewpoint emphasizes the necessity of establishing a layered and categorized responsibility system to ensure that party organizations and members understand, assume, and fulfill their responsibilities [1] - It highlights the importance of clear delineation of responsibilities among various levels of party organizations, including the primary responsibility of party secretaries and the supervisory role of discipline inspection commissions [1][3] - The article stresses the need for a precise and scientific accountability mechanism to ensure that responsibilities are effectively implemented at all levels [1] Group 2 - The "Chinese Communist Party Disciplinary Regulations" stipulate that failure to fulfill the responsibility of strict governance of the party can lead to warnings or severe warnings, and in serious cases, removal from party positions [2] - The regulations emphasize the importance of accountability for party organizations and leading cadres, particularly focusing on the responsibilities of the main leaders [3][6] - The article outlines the evolution of disciplinary regulations, indicating that the emphasis on political discipline has increased over time, reflecting a more comprehensive approach to party governance [4] Group 3 - The article defines the key subjects of responsibility as party organizations and leading cadres, indicating that the focus is on the "key minority" responsible for strict governance of the party [6] - It clarifies that the failure to fulfill responsibilities must be objectively evident, distinguishing between intentional non-fulfillment and inadequate performance of duties [7] - The article also discusses the necessity of serious consequences resulting from such failures, which must significantly harm the party's interests or image [8][9] Group 4 - The subjective aspect of disciplinary violations can be either intentional or negligent, with intentional actions leading to more severe consequences [10] - It emphasizes the interdependence of the main responsibility of party committees and the supervisory responsibility of discipline inspection commissions, highlighting that both are essential for effective governance [11] - The article differentiates between failures in strict governance of the party and general negligence in work responsibilities, noting the political implications of the former [11]

Group 1 - The core viewpoint emphasizes the need for political supervision to be specific, precise, and regular, aligning with local realities to support high-quality economic and social development [1] - Political supervision should focus on the major decisions and deployments of the Central Committee, ensuring their implementation through regular checks and political inspections [1][2] - Local governments, such as Lushan City in Jiangxi Province, are encouraged to strengthen supervision in key areas like ecological protection and tourism services to ensure compliance with relevant decisions [1] Group 2 - The approach includes closely monitoring the responsibilities of key leaders and addressing political deviations through targeted supervision [2] - There is a focus on accountability, with strict measures against negligence and a commitment to regular reporting on typical issues to enhance deterrence [2] - The integration of political supervision with daily oversight and investigations is highlighted, aiming to create a cohesive supervisory framework that enhances effectiveness [3] Group 3 - The establishment of specialized political supervision teams is proposed to coordinate responsibilities and ensure efficient collaboration among various departments [3] - The concept that case handling serves as a powerful form of supervision is emphasized, with a focus on improving mechanisms for cooperation and resource allocation [3] - A holistic approach to supervision, investigation, education, and governance is advocated to transform supervisory outcomes into effective governance [3]

Core Viewpoint - The county of Rongxian in Sichuan Province emphasizes the importance of inspection as a means to implement strict party governance and enhance internal supervision, focusing on innovative institutional frameworks and effective management processes [1][2] Group 1: Inspection and Rectification Mechanism - Rongxian has established a quantitative evaluation system for inspection rectification, defining clear standards for evaluation, including what to assess, how to assess, and how to utilize the results [1] - The county categorizes rectification issues by nature, with general issues to be resolved within six months, medium to long-term issues verified every six months, and complex issues tracked closely [1] Group 2: Evaluation Process - A "three-evaluation" process has been developed, involving self-evaluation by inspected organizations, evaluations by party members and the public, and supervisory evaluations of rectification [2] - The evaluation results are used as a basis for follow-up inspections, ensuring that rectification efforts are effectively implemented [2] Group 3: Outcomes and Impact - As of now, Rongxian has issued 51 rectification recommendations, identified 23 unresolved issues, and urged 35 units to continue their rectification efforts, addressing over 130 urgent issues faced by the public [2]

Core Viewpoint - The establishment of a hierarchical and regular conversation and inquiry mechanism by the disciplinary inspection and supervision authorities is an effective exploration to integrate political supervision with daily supervision, ensuring that supervision is embedded in daily operations and conducted regularly [1][2]. Group 1: Mechanism and Implementation - The mechanism involves regular conversations and inquiries from higher-level disciplinary secretaries to lower-level secretaries to understand the implementation of decisions, major matters, and the integrity of key personnel, particularly the "top leader" [1]. - The approach emphasizes the importance of political responsibility and daily supervision, particularly focusing on the "top leader" to enhance political awareness and clarify responsibilities [1][2]. Group 2: Focus Areas - The focus of conversations and inquiries is on weak points in supervision and potential corruption risks, particularly regarding the implementation of work deployments, significant expenditures, and personnel selection [2]. - Attention is given to issues raised by the public, including complaints against the "top leader" and serious violations, to comprehensively understand the political ecology of the region or unit [2]. Group 3: Methods and Effectiveness - Various methods are employed for conversations and inquiries, including face-to-face discussions and online communications, to ensure effective information gathering and timely corrections [2]. - A regular conversation mechanism is established to maintain ongoing pressure and reminders, integrating various activities such as research and guidance sessions [2]. Group 4: Follow-up and Accountability - The process emphasizes the importance of addressing identified issues and ensuring that corrective actions are taken, with a focus on collaborative analysis and deep inspection of responsibilities [3]. - There is a commitment to serious accountability for units and individuals that fail to rectify issues, particularly those that conceal information or protect wrongdoers, to promote a positive political ecology [3].