Group 1 - The core viewpoint emphasizes the need for political supervision to be specific, precise, and regular, aligning with local realities to support high-quality economic and social development [1] - Political supervision should focus on the major decisions and deployments of the Central Committee, ensuring their implementation through regular checks and political inspections [1][2] - Local governments, such as Lushan City in Jiangxi Province, are encouraged to strengthen supervision in key areas like ecological protection and tourism services to ensure compliance with relevant decisions [1] Group 2 - The approach includes closely monitoring the responsibilities of key leaders and addressing political deviations through targeted supervision [2] - There is a focus on accountability, with strict measures against negligence and a commitment to regular reporting on typical issues to enhance deterrence [2] - The integration of political supervision with daily oversight and investigations is highlighted, aiming to create a cohesive supervisory framework that enhances effectiveness [3] Group 3 - The establishment of specialized political supervision teams is proposed to coordinate responsibilities and ensure efficient collaboration among various departments [3] - The concept that case handling serves as a powerful form of supervision is emphasized, with a focus on improving mechanisms for cooperation and resource allocation [3] - A holistic approach to supervision, investigation, education, and governance is advocated to transform supervisory outcomes into effective governance [3]

Core Viewpoint - The county of Rongxian in Sichuan Province emphasizes the importance of inspection as a means to implement strict party governance and enhance internal supervision, focusing on innovative institutional frameworks and effective management processes [1][2] Group 1: Inspection and Rectification Mechanism - Rongxian has established a quantitative evaluation system for inspection rectification, defining clear standards for evaluation, including what to assess, how to assess, and how to utilize the results [1] - The county categorizes rectification issues by nature, with general issues to be resolved within six months, medium to long-term issues verified every six months, and complex issues tracked closely [1] Group 2: Evaluation Process - A "three-evaluation" process has been developed, involving self-evaluation by inspected organizations, evaluations by party members and the public, and supervisory evaluations of rectification [2] - The evaluation results are used as a basis for follow-up inspections, ensuring that rectification efforts are effectively implemented [2] Group 3: Outcomes and Impact - As of now, Rongxian has issued 51 rectification recommendations, identified 23 unresolved issues, and urged 35 units to continue their rectification efforts, addressing over 130 urgent issues faced by the public [2]

Core Viewpoint - The establishment of a hierarchical and regular conversation and inquiry mechanism by the disciplinary inspection and supervision authorities is an effective exploration to integrate political supervision with daily supervision, ensuring that supervision is embedded in daily operations and conducted regularly [1][2]. Group 1: Mechanism and Implementation - The mechanism involves regular conversations and inquiries from higher-level disciplinary secretaries to lower-level secretaries to understand the implementation of decisions, major matters, and the integrity of key personnel, particularly the "top leader" [1]. - The approach emphasizes the importance of political responsibility and daily supervision, particularly focusing on the "top leader" to enhance political awareness and clarify responsibilities [1][2]. Group 2: Focus Areas - The focus of conversations and inquiries is on weak points in supervision and potential corruption risks, particularly regarding the implementation of work deployments, significant expenditures, and personnel selection [2]. - Attention is given to issues raised by the public, including complaints against the "top leader" and serious violations, to comprehensively understand the political ecology of the region or unit [2]. Group 3: Methods and Effectiveness - Various methods are employed for conversations and inquiries, including face-to-face discussions and online communications, to ensure effective information gathering and timely corrections [2]. - A regular conversation mechanism is established to maintain ongoing pressure and reminders, integrating various activities such as research and guidance sessions [2]. Group 4: Follow-up and Accountability - The process emphasizes the importance of addressing identified issues and ensuring that corrective actions are taken, with a focus on collaborative analysis and deep inspection of responsibilities [3]. - There is a commitment to serious accountability for units and individuals that fail to rectify issues, particularly those that conceal information or protect wrongdoers, to promote a positive political ecology [3].