校园反犹太主义问题
Search documents
特朗普:向哈佛大学寻求10亿美元“赔偿” 希望未来与其“断绝一切关系”
Hua Xia Shi Bao· 2026-02-03 05:50
据央视新闻,美国总统特朗普2日在社交媒体上说,向哈佛大学寻求10亿美元的赔偿,并在未来与其断 绝一切关系。 据此前报道,2025年4月,特朗普政府以哈佛大学未充分解决校园反犹太主义问题为由,削减其逾20亿 美元联邦资助。7月21日,美国哈佛大学诉特朗普政府非法冻结联邦资金案在波士顿联邦地区法院举行 关键听证会。 2025年4月,特朗普政府宣布冻结对哈佛大学总额22亿美元的多年期拨款,以及6000万美元的多年期合 同款项。数月以来,特朗普政府和哈佛大学一直在就恢复研究经费进行谈判。 哈佛大学就被特朗普政府冻结经费一事向联邦法院提起诉讼,请求法官在9月3日之前对诉讼作出裁决。 特朗普曾称伯勒斯"系统性地接管了多起哈佛大学相关案件",并质疑为何由这名"憎恨特朗普"的法官审 理这些案件。特朗普还曾表示,只要这名法官作出不利裁决,联邦政府将立即上诉,并将停止向哈佛大 学提供数十亿美元资金。 当地时间2025年9月3日,美国波士顿联邦地区法官艾莉森·伯勒斯裁定特朗普政府冻结哈佛大学超过20 亿美元联邦资助的行为系非法。 该法官表示,特朗普政府在4月份暂停了哈佛大学一系列研究经费,没有遵循正当程序,且侵犯了哈佛 大学的言论 ...
受特朗普政府冻结资金影响,哈佛大学录得2011年以来最大亏损
Sou Hu Cai Jing· 2025-10-17 03:05
Core Insights - Harvard University reported a $113 million deficit for the fiscal year 2025, marking its first deficit since a $10 million loss in 2020 and the largest annual loss since 2011 [1] - President Alan M. Garber indicated that without immediate measures such as layoffs, hiring freezes, and salary cuts, the financial impact could have been more severe [1] - The Trump administration reduced over $2 billion in federal funding to Harvard, citing the university's insufficient response to campus anti-Semitism, leading to ongoing negotiations regarding the restoration of research funding [1]
特朗普政府冻结哈佛大学资金被裁非法 美官员表示将上诉
Yang Shi Xin Wen Ke Hu Duan· 2025-09-03 23:50
Core Viewpoint - The ruling by Judge Allison Burroughs deemed the Trump administration's freeze of over $2 billion in federal funding to Harvard University as illegal, citing violations of due process and free speech rights [2] Group 1: Legal Ruling - Judge Burroughs stated that the Trump administration did not follow proper procedures when suspending research funding to Harvard University [2] - The ruling emphasized that the freeze infringed upon Harvard's rights to free speech [2] Group 2: Government Response - White House spokesperson Liz Huston criticized Harvard for failing to protect students from harassment and allowing discrimination on campus [2] - Huston asserted that Harvard does not have a constitutional right to taxpayer funding and indicated that the government plans to appeal the ruling [2] Group 3: Background Context - The Trump administration's funding cut was based on claims that Harvard had not adequately addressed anti-Semitism on campus [2] - Ongoing negotiations between the Trump administration and Harvard regarding the restoration of research funding have been taking place since the funding freeze [2]