Core Insights - Harvard University reported a $113 million deficit for the fiscal year 2025, marking its first deficit since a $10 million loss in 2020 and the largest annual loss since 2011 [1] - President Alan M. Garber indicated that without immediate measures such as layoffs, hiring freezes, and salary cuts, the financial impact could have been more severe [1] - The Trump administration reduced over $2 billion in federal funding to Harvard, citing the university's insufficient response to campus anti-Semitism, leading to ongoing negotiations regarding the restoration of research funding [1]

Core Viewpoint - The ruling by Judge Allison Burroughs deemed the Trump administration's freeze of over $2 billion in federal funding to Harvard University as illegal, citing violations of due process and free speech rights [2] Group 1: Legal Ruling - Judge Burroughs stated that the Trump administration did not follow proper procedures when suspending research funding to Harvard University [2] - The ruling emphasized that the freeze infringed upon Harvard's rights to free speech [2] Group 2: Government Response - White House spokesperson Liz Huston criticized Harvard for failing to protect students from harassment and allowing discrimination on campus [2] - Huston asserted that Harvard does not have a constitutional right to taxpayer funding and indicated that the government plans to appeal the ruling [2] Group 3: Background Context - The Trump administration's funding cut was based on claims that Harvard had not adequately addressed anti-Semitism on campus [2] - Ongoing negotiations between the Trump administration and Harvard regarding the restoration of research funding have been taking place since the funding freeze [2]