校园教育公平性
Search documents
嚯,38%斯坦福本科生是“残疾人”
3 6 Ke· 2025-12-08 07:23
蛤?38%的斯坦福本科生都是"残疾人"??? 而且绝非个例……常春藤里有一个算一个,"残疾"比例都高到离谱。 不过,你要是以为这是"身残志坚"的励志故事,那就大错特错,NoNoNo! 他们的目的只有一个—— 考试时间能延长50%! 斯坦福38%本科生注册"残疾" 但事实上,在他们当中,绝大多数并非传统意义上的身体残疾,而是ADHD(注意力缺陷多动障碍)、焦虑抑郁诸如此类的心理问题。 获得该"残疾"认证的方式也相当简单,只需要一张基础的医生证明。 过去可能需要对应的临床数据佐证,例如药物治疗、相关病史等,但随着2008年《美国残疾人法案》(ADA)的修订,法律上对残疾的定义扩充到"阅 读、学习、集中注意力、思考"等认知学习过程受影响的群体。 高等教育与残疾协会(AHEAD)也随之发布指南,要求高校采取更为宽松的审核制度——更重视学生的个人感受,而不是仅依赖医学诊断。 与此同时,诊断标准也在逐步放宽,2013年美国精神病学协会修改了对ADHD的定义,从原先的明显临床损害,转变为只需要出现干扰或降低学习质量的 症状。 于是斯坦福开始为这类学生大开绿灯,只需要简单的自我验证,就能够好处多多。 比如说同样是考试环节,普 ...
嚯,38%斯坦福本科生是“残疾人”
量子位· 2025-12-08 04:00
Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the rising percentage of students at elite universities, particularly Stanford, who register as having disabilities, primarily for the purpose of receiving academic accommodations such as extended exam time. This trend raises concerns about the fairness and integrity of educational assessments in higher education institutions [2][11][15]. Group 1: Statistics and Trends - 38% of Stanford undergraduate students are registered as having disabilities, with 24% receiving academic or housing accommodations during the fall semester [2][3]. - Similar trends are observed at other elite institutions, with over 20% of undergraduates at Brown University and Harvard registered as disabled, and 34% at Amherst College [9]. - The number of students receiving accommodations due to disability at the University of Chicago has tripled over the past eight years, while at the University of California, Berkeley, it has increased more than fivefold over fifteen years [8]. Group 2: Systemic Issues and Exploitation - The process for obtaining disability certification has become easier, requiring only a basic doctor's note, leading to potential exploitation of the system [5][7]. - Wealthy families have been known to bribe doctors for disability diagnoses for their non-disabled children to gain academic advantages, as highlighted by the 2019 college admissions scandal [12][16]. - The article suggests that the current system disproportionately benefits affluent students while disadvantaging genuinely disabled students from lower-income backgrounds [16][17]. Group 3: Impact on Education and Resources - The increase in students with disability certifications has led to a significant rise in costs for universities, with Stanford's budget for accommodating these students tripling [25]. - The presence of a large number of students with disability accommodations can skew academic assessments, as those with accommodations often perform better on standardized tests compared to their peers without such accommodations [18][25]. - The trend of seeking disability status has become a social phenomenon among students, leading some to self-diagnose in response to peer pressure [20][21]. Group 4: Perspectives and Discussions - Some experts argue that the increase in accommodations is a sign of a functioning system that aims to support students with genuine learning disabilities [28]. - There is a call for a reevaluation of educational assessment standards to ensure fairness for all students, regardless of disability status [33]. - The article concludes with a discussion on the implications of these trends for educational equity and the potential need for systemic changes [36].