Core Viewpoint - The quality of case handling is essential for the high-quality development of disciplinary inspection and supervision work, with a focus on building a case quality community in Shanghai's Songjiang District [1] Group 1: Improving Case Quality - The case review department enhances communication with the handling department to improve the quality of self-handled cases through pre-review discussions, standardized audits during the review, and post-review rectifications [2] - Before case transfer for review, the review personnel provide guidance on issues such as nature identification, applicable regulations, and disposal of involved assets, ensuring a solid foundation for subsequent case reviews [2] - After case transfer, the review department rigorously checks evidence, classification, procedures, and documentation, ensuring thorough audits and timely feedback for improvements [2] Group 2: Strengthening Grassroots Case Handling - To address issues like insufficient manpower and lack of expertise in grassroots disciplinary inspection organizations, a collaborative review mechanism is established to enhance case handling quality [3] - All evidence materials are organized and submitted for review after initial handling, with a report generated to identify issues and provide corrective suggestions [3] - The review process includes direct communication with case handlers to clarify problems and ensure effective and targeted solutions [3] Group 3: Quality Assessment for Improvement - Case quality assessment is a crucial step in enforcing accountability and enhancing the quality of case reviews, with various assessment methods employed to improve efficiency [4] - The district's disciplinary inspection committee conducts self-assessments followed by random checks to ensure comprehensive evaluations of case files [4] - Mutual evaluations among case handling units promote learning and improvement, addressing both common and individual issues identified during assessments [5] Group 4: Addressing Common Issues - Common issues identified through quality assessments include incomplete identity materials and non-compliance in evidence collection procedures, which are addressed through direct feedback and specified rectification timelines [5] - A list of common problems is compiled to guide timely corrections and prevent recurrence of similar issues across handling units [5]