新华社北京12月9日电 英国首相斯塔默、法国总统马克龙、德国总理默茨8日在英国首都伦敦与乌克兰总统泽连斯基举行会谈，强调乌克兰需要 强有力的安全保障，同时肯定美国就结束俄乌冲突作出的努力。 英国广播公司（BBC）分析，欧洲既想支持乌克兰，又怕美国因此甩手不干，在有关结束俄乌冲突的外交斡旋中"走钢丝"。 10月17日，在美国首都华盛顿白宫，美国总统特朗普（左二）欢迎乌克兰总统泽连斯基（左三）。新华社记者胡友松摄 泽连斯基8日晚已抵达比利时首都布鲁塞尔，预计将同北约秘书长吕特、欧洲理事会主席科斯塔和欧盟委员会主席冯德莱恩会晤。9日，他将前往 意大利首都罗马，会晤意大利总理梅洛尼。 欧洲：与乌克兰站在一起 唐宁街10号发言人说，与会领导人同意，欧洲必须与乌克兰站在一起，加强乌克兰能源设施防御能力；同时强调需要在乌克兰实现公正且持久的 和平，其中包括强有力的对乌安全保障。发言人说，与会领导人还讨论了利用俄罗斯遭冻结资产支持乌克兰重建方面取得的"积极进展"。 BBC注意到欧洲领导人对美国的微妙态度，称他们仍对美国的参与予以肯定。唐宁街10号发言人在当天声明中说，英法德领导人讨论了由美国主 导、事关欧洲安全的和平谈判的" ...

Core Viewpoint - Finnish President Stubb emphasizes that security guarantees for Ukraine must be backed by real military support, not just verbal commitments, highlighting the need for tangible preparations in the face of potential Russian aggression [1][10]. Group 1: Security Guarantees - Stubb criticizes the superficial nature of security guarantees discussed at the recent Paris conference, questioning whether they are merely symbolic gestures without real military backing [3]. - He argues that without actual military readiness, assurances are akin to "cloud cat ownership," providing only psychological comfort without practical support [3][10]. Group 2: Diplomatic Relations - Stubb acknowledges the necessity for small countries like Finland to maintain good relations with the United States, despite uncertainties about U.S. reliability, as there are limited alternatives [5]. - He calls for European nations to adopt a more proactive stance in military preparedness, suggesting that they should not wait until a crisis arises to realize they are unprepared [5][10]. Group 3: Ongoing Negotiations - The current negotiations between Ukraine and Russia are described as stalled, with both sides holding firm on their conditions, complicating the potential for progress [7]. - Stubb expresses a pessimistic view on the negotiations, indicating that the ongoing conflict is likely to continue without significant changes in the current dynamics [7][8]. Group 4: Future Preparedness - Stubb's remarks serve as a reminder for European countries to prioritize genuine military readiness over mere rhetoric, advocating for a proactive approach to security [10]. - He warns that failing to prepare adequately could lead to dire consequences when faced with real threats, reinforcing the idea that security is not just about promises but about actual capabilities [10].

Core Viewpoint - The diplomatic tension between France and Italy has escalated due to comments made by Italian Deputy Prime Minister Matteo Salvini regarding French President Macron's support for Ukraine, leading to a formal protest from the French Foreign Ministry [1][2]. Group 1: Diplomatic Relations - France summoned the Italian ambassador to protest Salvini's remarks, which were deemed "unacceptable" and contrary to the trust and historical relationship between the two nations [1]. - Salvini's comments included a suggestion that Macron should personally go to Ukraine if he supports sending European troops, reflecting a growing discontent with France's stance on Ukraine [1][2]. Group 2: Political Context - Salvini's right-wing party, the League, is part of Italy's ruling coalition and has recently performed poorly in polls, which may influence his critical stance towards France [2]. - The political climate includes discussions among the U.S. and European allies about providing security guarantees to Ukraine, with proposals for U.S.-led European troop deployments [2]. Group 3: Military Alliances - A "volunteer alliance" led by France and the UK is considering sending troops to Ukraine if a ceasefire is reached, but Italy has repeatedly declined invitations to participate in this initiative [2].

Core Points - The summit in Alaska between US and Russian leaders has led to a significant shift in Trump's stance, raising widespread attention [1] - Despite no concrete agreements being reached, Putin appears to have achieved his desired outcomes, particularly in Trump's change of position [1] - Trump's previous hardline stance against Russia has softened, as he announced plans to suspend sanctions against Russia and not impose secondary tariffs on China for purchasing Russian oil [1][3] Group 1: Trump's Shift in Position - Prior to the summit, Trump had expressed strong opposition to Russia's actions, warning of severe consequences if no ceasefire agreement was reached [1] - Post-summit, Trump's comments indicate a 180-degree turn, suggesting a willingness to ease sanctions and engage differently with both Russia and China [1][3] Group 2: European Leaders' Involvement - European leaders are accompanying Ukrainian President Zelensky to the White House, ostensibly to support him but also to serve deeper strategic purposes [7] - Zelensky's lack of experience in international affairs raises concerns that he may compromise under pressure from Trump, hence the need for European leaders to provide support [7] - The presence of European leaders aims to mediate potential friction between Trump and Zelensky, preventing a repeat of past confrontations that could further tilt US support towards Russia [7] Group 3: Ukraine's Position - Zelensky's proposal for a ceasefire before negotiations has been rejected by Russia, which prefers a binding ceasefire agreement [5] - The Ukrainian president's stance aligns with the support of many European nations, particularly Germany and France, indicating a unified front against Russia's demands [5] - Zelensky is scheduled to meet with Trump and European leaders, highlighting the ongoing diplomatic efforts to navigate the complex geopolitical landscape [5][7]

Group 1 - Ukraine's Finance Minister, Sergey Marchenko, proposed Western partners to fund the Ukrainian armed forces and integrate them into the European defense system [1] - This decision is seen as having multiple strategic advantages for Ukraine, ensuring fiscal stability for 2026 and beyond, while providing a security buffer for the EU through the combat experience of the Ukrainian military [1] - The costs associated with supporting the Ukrainian armed forces for European security will represent only a minimal proportion of the EU's GDP and can be shared among willing countries [1]

Core Viewpoint - The long-term effective security guarantee for Ukraine and Europe is contingent upon Ukraine's accession to NATO [1] Group 1 - The Estonian Foreign Minister, Urmas Reinsalu, emphasizes the importance of NATO membership for Ukraine in ensuring security [1]