美联储理事库克在房产申报争议和特朗普解职诉讼中面临多项指控。 就在美联储理事库克诉美国总统特朗普的首场听证会召开前夕，前者再陷房产申报争议。 当地时间8月28日，美国联邦住房金融署署长普尔特（Bill Pulte）在社交媒体上发文称，库克在担任美 联储理事期间，在第三处房产贷款和政府申报中存在虚假陈述。 稍早前，库克已就特朗普将其解职一事向华盛顿特区联邦法院正式提起诉讼，并申请初步禁令，允许其 在案件审理期间继续履行美联储理事职责。 库克称，特朗普对其罢免的举动"非法"，且是对美联储独立性的极大攻击。 库克在诉状中称，特朗普此举的真正原因是"为了迅速罢免她，腾出一个（美联储理事）席位，并推进 他的议程，以破坏美联储的独立性。" 该案首场听证会将于当地时间29日上午10点举行。 第三起房产虚假申报？ 根据普尔特向美国司法部部长帕姆·邦迪递交的第二封刑事转介函，库克于2021年4月7日为其位于马萨 诸塞州剑桥市的公寓办理了一笔15年期抵押贷款，并将其申报为"第二居所"。 然而，仅8个月后，库克在向美国政府提交的一份道德规范表格中，却将该处房产列为"投资/出租房 产"，并申报了1.5万至5万美元的租金收入。在此后2 ...

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the legal challenge initiated by Federal Reserve Governor Lisa Cook against President Trump's decision to dismiss her, emphasizing the implications for the independence of the central bank and the interpretation of "for cause" in the context of her removal [4][5][9]. Summary by Sections - **Legal Action Initiated** Lisa Cook filed a lawsuit in Washington, D.C., against President Trump, seeking to challenge her dismissal and maintain her position as a Federal Reserve Governor [3][4]. - **Claims of Illegality** Cook's legal team argues that Trump's dismissal is "illegal and invalid," warning that if upheld, it could redefine the boundaries of central bank independence [5][6]. - **Term and Just Cause** The lawsuit highlights that the Federal Reserve Act stipulates a 14-year term for governors and requires "just cause" for removal, aimed at preventing monetary policy from being influenced by short-term political interests [6][9]. - **Core Issue of Just Cause** Legal experts indicate that the interpretation of "just cause" will be central to the case, typically encompassing severe misconduct, malfeasance, or inappropriate behavior during the term [9]. - **Allegations Against Cook** The core reason for Trump's dismissal relates to alleged false statements made by Cook in her mortgage applications prior to her nomination, which her lawyers argue are merely clerical errors and do not constitute just cause for removal [10]. - **Court Proceedings** A hearing is scheduled for August 29, where the court will consider Cook's request for a temporary restraining order against her dismissal, marking a significant moment in the history of the Federal Reserve [8][10]. - **Judicial Oversight** The case has been assigned to Judge Jia Cobb, who has previously ruled against the Trump administration, suggesting that the case may be subject to appeals in higher courts [10].

Core Argument - Cook has officially filed a lawsuit challenging President Trump's decision to dismiss her as a Federal Reserve Board member, claiming it is "illegal and invalid" [1][2] Group 1: Legal Proceedings - A hearing is scheduled for August 29 at 10 AM in the Washington Federal District Court to decide on a temporary restraining order to pause Trump's dismissal during the case [1][3] - The lawsuit emphasizes that the Federal Reserve Act stipulates a 14-year term for board members and requires "just cause" for dismissal, aimed at preventing short-term political interests from influencing monetary policy [2][4] Group 2: Allegations and Responses - Trump's dismissal rationale centers on alleged false statements made by Cook in her mortgage applications, which are claimed to be uninvestigated and without any convictions [5] - Cook's legal team argues that the mortgage application issue may be a mere clerical error and does not constitute the necessary "just cause" for her removal [5] - The White House has stated that Trump reviewed the loan-related documents and believes there are sufficient grounds for Cook's dismissal, indicating a strong defense in court [5] Group 3: Judicial Context - This case marks the first instance in Federal Reserve history where a direct conflict between a president and a board member is taken to court, drawing significant attention from markets and academia [3] - Legal experts suggest that the interpretation of "just cause" will be central to the case, typically covering severe misconduct, malfeasance, or inappropriate behavior during the term [4]