Group 1 - The core idea of the article revolves around the evolution of social media from a platform for sharing opinions to a marketplace for product recommendations, highlighting the rise of "grass planting" as a popular trend [1][3] - The concept of "attention economy" is introduced, where the ability to filter and recommend information becomes a valuable asset in an era of information overload [2][11] - "Grass planting" has transformed into a standardized product that can drive sales and support entire content supply chains, leading to a loss of trust among consumers [3][4] Group 2 - The emergence of "bad product sharing" reflects a growing skepticism towards traditional product recommendations, as it openly discusses the flaws of products rather than solely promoting their benefits [4][13] - "Bad products" are characterized by their design flaws or overpromises, yet they often possess redeeming qualities that keep consumers engaged [5][6] - The trend of "bad product sharing" allows creators to escape the pressure of promoting only positive reviews, making their content more relatable and credible [14][15] Group 3 - The article discusses how brands are beginning to embrace the concept of "bad product sharing" as a way to generate discussion and engagement, sometimes even leading to increased sales [14][15] - The blurred lines between "good" and "bad" products complicate consumer decision-making, as users struggle to discern genuine reviews from marketing tactics [15][16] - "Bad product sharing" serves as a counter-narrative to the idealized lifestyle often portrayed in marketing, revealing the absurdities behind seemingly perfect products [16][17] Group 4 - The phenomenon of "bad product sharing" provides consumers with a more authentic perspective on products, allowing them to make informed decisions based on real experiences [18] - The article emphasizes that while "bad product sharing" is gaining traction, it should not become the norm, as consumers should not remain in a constant state of skepticism [18]