景涛 案件质量是司法公信力的基石。最高人民检察院提出构建检察"大管理"格局，发布《人民检察院案件质 量检查与评查工作规定》，要求建立健全"每案必检"工作机制，推动实现案件质量检查与评查常态化、 规范化。深入挖掘"每案必检"工作机制的理论与实践价值，并结合检察实践探索深化落实，能够为构建 科学、规范、高效的案件质量管控体系提供理论参考与实践指引。 "每案必检"工作机制的内涵要义 "每案必检"并非简单的程序叠加或形式审查，而是检察机关在习近平法治思想指引下，对司法办案规律 和检察权运行规律的深刻把握。其本质是对进入检察环节的每一个案件开展全流程、全要素的质量管 控。该机制是包含自查、检查、评查三个递进式环节的体系运作，要求实现案件质量评价从"部分抽 查"到"全面体检"的系统性跃升。"每案必检"要求对检察机关办理的每一个案件，在办案过程中或办结 后，由不同主体（承办人、部门负责人、案件管理部门、检察委员会等）、不同层级（本院、上级 院），采用自查、检查、评查等不同形式，对事实认定、证据采信、法律适用、办案程序、文书制作、 释法说理、办案效果及司法责任制落实等进行各有侧重的审视与核查。"每案必检"工作机制的启动标志 ...

Core Viewpoint - The establishment of a scientific and reasonable case quality inspection mechanism is essential for enhancing the quality of judicial cases, emphasizing the responsibility of prosecutors in ensuring case quality and the need for a systematic approach to case management [2][3][4]. Group 1: Case Quality Inspection Mechanism - A scientific case quality inspection mechanism should be established, detailing operational standards to guide prosecutors in fulfilling their inspection responsibilities [3][4]. - The implementation of a self-inspection standard aims to achieve "every case must be inspected," starting with major case categories and gradually extending to others [3][4]. - Standardized online inspections will be prioritized, with self-inspection reports required within ten working days after case closure [3][4]. Group 2: Quality Assessment and Scoring - A quantitative scoring system will be adopted for case quality assessments, rewarding well-handled cases and penalizing those with issues [4][5]. - Clear classification standards for issues will be established, with mechanisms for addressing both minor and severe flaws in case handling [4][5]. Group 3: Case Quality Verification - A case quality verification mechanism is crucial for ensuring the substantive implementation of quality inspections, with a focus on objective and comprehensive evaluations [6][7]. - Specific cases, such as those under review by higher courts or involving significant procedural violations, will be prioritized for verification [6][7]. Group 4: Evaluation and Feedback Mechanism - The evaluation process will shift from quantity to quality, integrating case management methods to enhance overall case handling effectiveness [8][9]. - A closed-loop management system will be established to ensure that evaluation results lead to corrective actions and training [9][10]. Group 5: Long-term Management and Collaboration - A collaborative mechanism for case quality management will be developed to address common issues and enhance the overall quality of case handling [11][12]. - Continuous improvement and long-term mechanisms will be established to address recurring issues and ensure compliance with legal standards [12].