Core Viewpoint - The establishment of the "Every Case Must Be Inspected" mechanism is essential for enhancing the quality of judicial cases and ensuring public trust in the judicial system [2][4]. Group 1: Mechanism Overview - The "Every Case Must Be Inspected" mechanism is not merely a procedural addition but a comprehensive quality control system that encompasses self-inspection, inspection, and evaluation of every case [3][4]. - This mechanism signifies a shift from traditional post-event evaluations to a proactive, continuous quality management approach throughout the case handling process [3][4]. Group 2: Functions and Objectives - The mechanism aims to prevent quality issues at the source through dual verification by case handlers and departmental checks, identifying risks at critical stages of case processing [5][6]. - It enhances dynamic quality control during case handling, allowing for real-time corrections and ensuring both efficiency and quality in judicial processes [5][6]. - The mechanism emphasizes self-regulation within the prosecutorial framework, holding case handlers accountable for quality and integrating management responsibilities [6]. Group 3: Implementation Strategies - To effectively implement the mechanism, a multi-dimensional approach involving ideology, systems, technology, and culture is necessary [7][8]. - Establishing a comprehensive, tiered inspection standard system tailored to local conditions is crucial for effective quality checks [8]. - The integration of technology, such as intelligent inspection systems and data analysis models, will support the mechanism by automating quality checks and enhancing data-driven decision-making [9]. Group 4: Continuous Improvement - Ongoing evaluation of the mechanism's effectiveness is essential to objectively assess its impact on case quality and judicial credibility [10][11]. - The systematic extraction of successful practices across regions will contribute to the development of replicable and scalable institutional norms [11].

Core Viewpoint - The establishment of a scientific and reasonable case quality inspection mechanism is essential for enhancing the quality of judicial cases, emphasizing the responsibility of prosecutors in ensuring case quality and the need for a systematic approach to case management [2][3][4]. Group 1: Case Quality Inspection Mechanism - A scientific case quality inspection mechanism should be established, detailing operational standards to guide prosecutors in fulfilling their inspection responsibilities [3][4]. - The implementation of a self-inspection standard aims to achieve "every case must be inspected," starting with major case categories and gradually extending to others [3][4]. - Standardized online inspections will be prioritized, with self-inspection reports required within ten working days after case closure [3][4]. Group 2: Quality Assessment and Scoring - A quantitative scoring system will be adopted for case quality assessments, rewarding well-handled cases and penalizing those with issues [4][5]. - Clear classification standards for issues will be established, with mechanisms for addressing both minor and severe flaws in case handling [4][5]. Group 3: Case Quality Verification - A case quality verification mechanism is crucial for ensuring the substantive implementation of quality inspections, with a focus on objective and comprehensive evaluations [6][7]. - Specific cases, such as those under review by higher courts or involving significant procedural violations, will be prioritized for verification [6][7]. Group 4: Evaluation and Feedback Mechanism - The evaluation process will shift from quantity to quality, integrating case management methods to enhance overall case handling effectiveness [8][9]. - A closed-loop management system will be established to ensure that evaluation results lead to corrective actions and training [9][10]. Group 5: Long-term Management and Collaboration - A collaborative mechanism for case quality management will be developed to address common issues and enhance the overall quality of case handling [11][12]. - Continuous improvement and long-term mechanisms will be established to address recurring issues and ensure compliance with legal standards [12].