Core Viewpoint - The Yunnan judicial system is actively implementing innovative practices to protect the healthy growth of minors, focusing on professional case handling, collaborative efforts, and brand leadership to create a robust legal protection framework for minors in various backgrounds [1][10]. Group 1: Professional Case Handling - The Yunnan judicial authorities are addressing new and old challenges in the field of minor protection with a professional approach, exemplified by a case in which a beverage shop sold alcoholic milk tea to minors, leading to a public interest lawsuit and subsequent regulatory improvements [1][4]. - The establishment of the "Teng·Love" studio in Tengchong provides a child-friendly environment for legal processes, minimizing secondary harm to minors involved in cases of abuse [3][4]. Group 2: Collaborative Efforts - The Yunnan judicial system has shifted from isolated efforts to a collaborative model, integrating resources from various departments to enhance the protection of minors, as seen in the creation of a specialized representative working station in Kunming [4][7]. - The "12345" working method in Tengchong exemplifies effective collaboration, involving multiple departments in targeted campaigns to address issues in key areas such as rental housing and schools [4][7]. Group 3: Brand Leadership - The establishment of brands like "Wei Xiao Hua," "Teng·Love," and "Guomen·Qingyou" reflects a commitment to localized protection efforts, with each brand focusing on specific community needs and integrating social work resources [9][10]. - The "Guomen·Qingyou" initiative in Ruili emphasizes the importance of legal education and support for foreign students, showcasing a tailored approach to meet the unique needs of the border community [7][9].

Core Points - The article discusses the issues surrounding the credit system for enterprises in China, highlighting the challenges faced by companies due to improper administrative penalties and credit punishment measures [1][2][3][4]. Group 1: Administrative Penalties and Credit Damage - The Supreme People's Procuratorate reported that from January last year to June this year, 1,366 cases related to social credit were handled, including 557 cases of improper credit punishment by administrative agencies and 260 cases of breach of trust [1]. - Some administrative agencies have been found to improperly publicize minor penalties, such as a 300 yuan fine, for up to three years, which can unjustly damage a company's credit [2]. - The use of big data has revealed that 1,975 administrative penalty records published in 2023 were all from simplified procedures, with 2,487 records involving fines below 500 yuan, yet all set for the maximum three-year publicity period [2]. Group 2: Credit Restoration Challenges - The current issues in credit restoration for enterprises include non-standard collection of breach of trust information and untimely notifications regarding credit restoration [2]. - As of June 30 this year, over 17 million individuals have been compelled to either repay debts or reach settlements due to credit punishment and consumption restrictions [3]. - There are instances where companies have been wrongfully included in the list of dishonest executors, leading to severe operational restrictions, such as being unable to secure bank loans [3]. Group 3: Legal Environment and Credit Repair - The article emphasizes the need for a legal business environment, noting that companies declared bankrupt may still be wrongfully listed as dishonest executors, which undermines their operational rights and judicial credibility [4]. - The procuratorial authorities have taken steps to rectify wrongful high consumption restrictions on companies that have been declared bankrupt, promoting credit restoration initiatives to alleviate difficulties faced by enterprises [4]. - Companies are encouraged to operate legally and protect their credit, and they have the right to apply for credit restoration if wrongfully listed as dishonest [4].

Core Points - The case involves a labor dispute where the worker, Shi, was owed 30,000 yuan in wages for a renovation job but faced delays in payment from the employer, Chen [1] - After a court ruling in April 2023, Chen was ordered to pay 28,000 yuan in installments, but failed to comply, leading to a request for enforcement supervision by the worker [1][2] - The local prosecutor's office intervened by identifying available assets for enforcement, specifically an insurance claim, which allowed the worker to recover the owed wages by June 2025 [2] Group 1 - The worker, Shi, initially sought payment for 30,000 yuan in wages after completing a renovation job, but faced non-payment from the employer, Chen [1] - The court ruled in favor of Shi, ordering Chen to pay 28,000 yuan, but Chen did not comply, prompting Shi to seek enforcement [1][2] - The prosecutor's office played a crucial role in identifying an insurance payout that enabled the recovery of the owed wages [2] Group 2 - The local prosecutor's office has been actively monitoring cases related to labor fees, alimony, and medical expenses, issuing 10 supervisory suggestions and recovering over 380,000 yuan in total [2] - The prosecutor's office emphasizes its commitment to addressing public concerns and ensuring that justice is served in labor-related disputes [3]

Group 1 - The Private Economy Promotion Law took effect on May 20, aiming to ensure equal legal protection for various business entities and enhance the supervision of law enforcement practices [1] - The Supreme People's Procuratorate (SPP) will focus on three main areas: supervision of coercive measures in criminal cases, rectifying the use of criminal means in civil economic disputes, and regulating cross-regional law enforcement behaviors [1] - The SPP will implement a comprehensive approach to civil execution supervision, particularly targeting false litigation related to the private economy, and will enhance the effectiveness of case handling through various legal mechanisms [2] Group 2 - The administrative prosecution department will handle cases related to administrative penalties and agreements, ensuring the protection of private economic organizations' legal rights [3] - The SPP will strengthen the enforcement of intellectual property rights, focusing on high-tech and emerging industries, and will enhance punitive measures against intellectual property infringements [4] - The SPP will streamline channels for complaints and appeals related to private economic entities, prioritizing the handling of such cases through dedicated service centers [6]

央视网消息：据最高检，5月16日，在民法典颁布五周年之际，最高人民检察院以"'典'亮生活，守护美 好"为主题，举办检察开放日活动。活动中，最高检发布第四批贯彻实施民法典典型案例，展现检察机 关保障民法典统一正确实施，高质效办好每一个案件的成效。 该批典型案例共6件，分别是：刘某珍与康某卿离婚纠纷再审检察建议案，俞某与邵某甲、邵某乙房屋 买卖合同纠纷再审检察建议案，董某礼与某村五组、田某明、田某友土地承包经营权确认纠纷抗诉案， 贾某勤与贾某满等提供劳务者受害责任纠纷抗诉案，王某廷等人赡养纠纷执行类案监督案，邹某萍与某 针织公司姓名权纠纷支持起诉案。 这6件典型案例分别涉及民法典总则编、物权编、合同编、人格权编、婚姻家庭编、侵权编等6编内容， 阐释了离婚经济补偿、监护制度、土地承包经营权流转、建设工程领域涉人身损害赔偿、赡养抚养、姓 名权保护等法律问题。 例如，在刘某珍与康某卿离婚纠纷再审检察建议案中，刘某珍虽承担较多抚育子女等家庭义务，但因不 易举证，在离婚诉讼中未能获得经济补偿。检察机关通过调查核实，认定刘某珍独自抚养其子至成年， 通过向法院制发再审检察建议予以监督，依法保护刘某珍获得经济补偿的权利。 又如， ...