于民心处扎根，监督的力度蕴藏于"检察为民"的点滴细节，体现在以更优法治"供给"解决群众操心事、 烦心事、揪心事的务实行动中。河南检察机关针对人大代表反映的农贸市场食品安全隐患，依法启动行 政公益诉讼程序，实现从事后处置向事前预防的转型，推动构建制度化的风险防控体系，守护群众"舌 尖上的安全"。福建检察机关接力推动，在全省范围内打通120急救系统文字呼救功能，让16.6万听障人 士告别"无声呼救"难题，将法定监督职责转化为普惠性公共产品，推动解决特定群体的急难愁盼。湖北 检察机关通过监督办案推动破解过度医疗治理难题，对涉案医院提起民事公益诉讼并适用惩罚性赔偿， 以检察公益诉讼履职遏制过度医疗冲动，推动规范医疗秩序、保护不特定患者合法权益和医疗基金安 全。这些案例证明，强有力的检察监督，能有效促进行政监管、激活社会共治，将法律条文转化为惠及 寻常百姓的福祉，守护民生底线。 "办案"是检察履职的主要方式。党的二十届四中全会专门强调，"强化检察监督"。最高人民检察院带领 全国检察机关不折不扣落实党中央要求，以强化检察监督的实际行动向党和人民交出检察答卷。在这份 答卷中，强化检察监督的力度如何体现？效果如何呈现？答案， ...

1月28日，最高人民检察院召开2025年度十大检察新闻、十大法律监督案例定评会暨检察新闻宣传工 作座谈会。 本报全媒体记者钟心宇摄 2025年度"双十大"定评会评委名单 童建明 最高人民检察院党组副书记、分管日常工作的副检察长 刘 昕 全国人大常委会办公厅新闻局副局长 赵海燕 全国政协办公厅新闻局局长 吕艳利 中央政法委宣传教育局一级巡视员 杜尚泽 人民日报社编委委员兼政治文化部主任 张晓松 新华社国内部副主任、中央新闻采访中心主任 段晓超 中央广播电视总台社教节目中心副主任 白玛央金 中央广播电视总台新闻中心社会新闻部主任 郭丽君 光明日报社政治经济部主任 陈发宝 经济日报社综合新闻部主任 雷 蕾 中国日报社国内部副主任 王四新 工人日报社党委委员、副社长 吴湘韩 中国青年报社党委常委、副总编辑 孙钱斌 中国妇女报社党委书记、社长兼总编辑 万学忠 法治日报社党委委员、副总编辑 何 江 人民法院新闻传媒总社党委委员、副总编辑 周学胜 公安部新闻传媒中心主任、总编辑 何晶茹 人民网编委、中国共产党新闻网主任 1 "强化检察监督，加强公益诉讼"写入党的二十届四中全会《建议》，最高检强调不折不扣落实党中 央决策部署 ...

Core Insights - In 2025, the Shandong Provincial Procuratorate effectively enhanced the quality and efficiency of prosecutorial supervision through 264 proposals made by National People's Congress representatives, focusing on key issues such as ecological protection of the Yellow River, business environment, and livelihood security [1] - The collaboration between National People's Congress representatives and the procuratorial system has contributed to the construction of a higher level of rule of law in Shandong Province, with a focus on social governance and public welfare [2][3] Group 1: Legislative and Supervisory Actions - The Shandong Provincial Procuratorate implemented a special supervision plan to support the major national strategy of the Yellow River, establishing a brand for river basin governance [1] - The procuratorial system has integrated technology, such as satellite remote sensing, to enhance ecological protection efforts [1] - Legislative proposals from representatives have led to the establishment of mechanisms for better alignment between prosecutorial suggestions and representative recommendations [7] Group 2: Community and Business Engagement - The procuratorial system has actively engaged with local businesses, providing one-stop legal services to enhance the business environment [1][6] - Special actions like "Protecting Core 2025" have been initiated to address specific industry needs, demonstrating the procuratorial system's responsiveness to economic development [2] - The procuratorial system has focused on protecting minors and enhancing public safety through targeted actions against food and drug safety violations [8] Group 3: Technological Integration and Innovation - The procuratorial system has emphasized the importance of intellectual property protection and the judicial response to commercial secret infringements, aligning with national goals for technological self-reliance [9][10] - There is a call for further integration of technology in prosecutorial work to improve the efficiency and effectiveness of legal supervision [10] Group 4: Social Justice and Public Welfare - The procuratorial system has been proactive in addressing social issues, such as the protection of women's rights and the rights of vulnerable groups, through various initiatives [10] - The focus on community engagement and the provision of legal support reflects a commitment to social justice and the protection of public interests [6][10]

2025年11月，广东省河源市检察院干警到某实业公司进行回访。 地处粤东北的广东省河源市，是华南地区重要生态屏障，也是广东省推动生态优先、绿色发展的战略节 点。随着粤港澳大湾区新兴产业加快崛起，这一发展态势对法治化营商环境提出了更高要求。近年来， 河源市检察机关依托营商环境法治服务监督中心，以高质效检察履职破解企业发展难题、守护市场主体 权益。 协同聚力让企业诉求事事有回音 "企业经营要合法化，关键的土地手续却迟迟办不下来。"河源市某科技有限公司负责人陈某向走访的检 察官道出困境。原来，由于相关招商承诺未完全落实，土地使用手续未能及时完善，企业一直无法取得 土地使用权证，给企业后续规划、生产经营等带来一定阻力。在此期间，因部分建筑手续不全，当地行 政执法部门依法责令企业整改。一边是发展受阻，一边是整改压力，企业感到左右为难。 据悉，河源市检察院与市直机关工委等多部门共同参与的"8+N"工作机制，通过"一窗受理、检察牵 头、分类转办、跟踪督办"的模式，已推动解决类似企业合法诉求百余件，挽回经济损失逾两千万元。 精准监督兑现企业权益 近日，河源市某工程公司负责人收到150万元首期款后，紧锁数月的眉头终于舒展。此前 ...

Core Viewpoint - The Chengdu People's Procuratorate aims to provide stronger judicial guarantees for the city's modernization and high-quality development, targeting a "national first-class" goal by 2025 [1]. Group 1: Political Construction and Judicial Integrity - The procuratorate emphasizes political loyalty and the implementation of Xi Jinping's legal thought, with a focus on the "two safeguards" [2]. - A "30 key tasks to support high-quality development in Chengdu" has been established, alongside measures to protect the overseas rights of enterprises [2]. Group 2: Economic Crime and Public Safety - A total of 8,196 individuals were arrested and 16,643 prosecuted for criminal offenses, with a focus on serious crimes such as organized crime and drug-related offenses [3]. - Economic crimes saw 1,865 arrests, and 136 intellectual property cases were handled, recovering 260 million yuan for enterprises [3]. Group 3: Social Justice and Public Welfare - The procuratorate handled 380 public interest lawsuits related to food and drug safety, and 79 cases involving the infringement of personal information [6]. - Support for vulnerable groups included recovering 11.53 million yuan in unpaid wages for 378 migrant workers and assisting 57 civil lawsuits for women, the elderly, and disabled individuals [6]. Group 4: Judicial Supervision and Accountability - The procuratorate supervised 85 cases of prosecution and 489 cases of withdrawal, with 454 individuals pursued for arrest [7]. - A total of 272 civil execution supervision cases were processed, ensuring over 19 million yuan in execution compliance [7]. Group 5: Strengthening the Procuratorial System - The Chengdu procuratorate plans to enhance grassroots construction and has received recognition for its exemplary units and brands [8]. - A focus on talent development is evident, with 13 prosecutors recognized as top performers and 24 research projects approved by higher authorities [8].

Group 1: Criminal Prosecution Supervision - In the period from January to November 2025, the prosecution filed 5,205 appeals against criminal judgments deemed erroneous, with 3,990 cases adjudicated by the courts, of which 71.5% resulted in retrials or reversals [1] - The prosecution issued 10,400 corrective opinions on illegal activities in criminal trials, achieving a 91.2% acceptance rate [1] - The prosecution supervised 15,000 cases where investigations should have been initiated but were not, and 39,600 cases where investigations were improperly initiated, along with 79,000 written corrective opinions on illegal investigative activities [1] Group 2: Civil Prosecution Supervision - From January to November 2025, the prosecution filed 9,833 appeals and retrial recommendations against erroneous civil judgments, with 7,201 cases adjudicated, where 90.5% resulted in retrials, reversals, or settlements [2] - The prosecution issued 85,000 corrective opinions on illegal activities in civil trials, with an acceptance rate of 83.6% [2] - A special activity was launched to supervise the execution of civil cases, resulting in the restoration of over 3,300 cases and the recovery of 970 million yuan [2] Group 3: Administrative Prosecution Supervision - In the same period, the prosecution filed 547 appeals and retrial recommendations against erroneous administrative judgments, with 308 cases adjudicated, where 75% resulted in retrials, reversals, or settlements [2] - The prosecution issued 27,000 corrective opinions on illegal activities in administrative trials, achieving an acceptance rate of 85.02% [2] - The prosecution conducted non-litigation execution supervision in the social security sector, handling 3,514 related cases and promoting the substantive resolution of 3,696 administrative disputes [2]

Core Viewpoint - The establishment of a scientific and reasonable case quality inspection mechanism is essential for enhancing the quality of judicial cases, emphasizing the responsibility of prosecutors in ensuring case quality and the need for a systematic approach to case management [2][3][4]. Group 1: Case Quality Inspection Mechanism - A scientific case quality inspection mechanism should be established, detailing operational standards to guide prosecutors in fulfilling their inspection responsibilities [3][4]. - The implementation of a self-inspection standard aims to achieve "every case must be inspected," starting with major case categories and gradually extending to others [3][4]. - Standardized online inspections will be prioritized, with self-inspection reports required within ten working days after case closure [3][4]. Group 2: Quality Assessment and Scoring - A quantitative scoring system will be adopted for case quality assessments, rewarding well-handled cases and penalizing those with issues [4][5]. - Clear classification standards for issues will be established, with mechanisms for addressing both minor and severe flaws in case handling [4][5]. Group 3: Case Quality Verification - A case quality verification mechanism is crucial for ensuring the substantive implementation of quality inspections, with a focus on objective and comprehensive evaluations [6][7]. - Specific cases, such as those under review by higher courts or involving significant procedural violations, will be prioritized for verification [6][7]. Group 4: Evaluation and Feedback Mechanism - The evaluation process will shift from quantity to quality, integrating case management methods to enhance overall case handling effectiveness [8][9]. - A closed-loop management system will be established to ensure that evaluation results lead to corrective actions and training [9][10]. Group 5: Long-term Management and Collaboration - A collaborative mechanism for case quality management will be developed to address common issues and enhance the overall quality of case handling [11][12]. - Continuous improvement and long-term mechanisms will be established to address recurring issues and ensure compliance with legal standards [12].

Group 1 - The core viewpoint of the news is the importance of protecting the rights of specific groups such as the elderly and military personnel, highlighting the role of judicial supervision in ensuring these protections [1][2] - The Xuhui District Procuratorate identified issues in public sports venues regarding the lack of ticket sales windows and failure to provide discounts for specific groups, leading to legal action and recommendations for improvement [1][2] - Following the recommendations, public sports venues have implemented preferential pricing for specific groups and established a military discount window, demonstrating a positive response to the procuratorate's oversight [2] Group 2 - The hearing aimed to assess the progress of rectifications made by the involved sports venues and to gather feedback from representatives, emphasizing the need for ongoing evaluation of the implemented changes [2] - Suggestions were made to enhance the effectiveness of the hearing process, including training for hearing officers and improving the evaluation mechanisms for the outcomes of such hearings [2][3] - The importance of expanding the scope of rights protection to include other groups, such as maritime workers, was highlighted, indicating a broader societal commitment to improving the welfare of various specific groups [3]

Core Viewpoint - The case highlights the complexities of work-related injury recognition, particularly in situations where the circumstances of the incident are ambiguous and the employer's responsibilities in providing evidence are critical [1][7]. Group 1: Incident Overview - The incident involved a 58-year-old employee, referred to as Lao Sun, who died in a traffic accident just 30 meters from his workplace after taking leave [2][3]. - The accident occurred on August 20, 2020, when Lao Sun was struck by a speeding car shortly after leaving his post [2]. Group 2: Initial Responses and Legal Proceedings - Following the incident, Lao Sun's family applied for work injury recognition, but the employer claimed he had left his post without permission, leading to a denial of the claim by the human resources department [3][4]. - The initial court rulings supported the human resources department's decision, stating that the family could not prove the accident occurred on Lao Sun's way home [3][4]. Group 3: Investigative Actions - The East Guangdong Procuratorate intervened, identifying several inconsistencies in the evidence provided by the employer, including the absence of crucial surveillance footage from the incident [5][6]. - The investigation revealed that Lao Sun's actions of leaving for lunch or returning home fell within a "reasonable route" for a work-related journey, as per the regulations [4][5]. Group 4: Legal Reassessment and Outcome - In May 2023, the East Guangdong Procuratorate recommended a retrial, leading to a reassessment of the case by the court, which ultimately ruled in favor of recognizing the incident as a work-related injury [7]. - The human resources department subsequently acknowledged the work injury and initiated compensation procedures, resulting in a total compensation of 1.03 million yuan being awarded to Lao Sun's family [8]. Group 5: Community and Legal Impact - The case underscores the importance of thorough evidence collection and the responsibilities of employers in work injury claims, as well as the role of legal institutions in ensuring justice for affected families [9][10]. - The positive outcome and the family's gratitude reflect the effectiveness of the legal system in addressing work-related injury claims and the commitment of legal professionals to uphold justice [10][11].

Core Viewpoint - The Supreme People's Procuratorate, led by Chief Prosecutor Ying Yong, is focusing on enhancing legal supervision and supporting high-quality economic and social development through a series of inspections and initiatives in Shanxi province [1][3]. Group 1: Current Work Re-deployment and Deepening - The Chief Prosecutor emphasized the need for in-depth supervision of illegal cross-regional law enforcement and profit-driven judicial practices, urging the handling of typical and influential cases to promote governance through cases and improve long-term mechanisms for enterprise-related law enforcement [3]. - There is a strong focus on practical measures for the public, with an emphasis on judicial assistance, prosecution support, and addressing urgent issues faced by the public, particularly in the context of year-end labor disputes and protecting specific groups' rights [3][4]. Group 2: New Initiatives and Requirements for Prosecutorial Work - The Chief Prosecutor called for the establishment of a correct performance view, strict adherence to lawful case handling, and the exploration of high-quality case standards, ensuring that quality requirements are implemented in every case [7][10]. - There is a commitment to preventing issues such as "data beautification" and "performance misalignment," with a focus on maintaining judicial integrity and quality over mere quantity [10]. - The Chief Prosecutor proposed enhancing digital prosecution mechanisms, emphasizing the use of artificial intelligence to assist judicial processes while ensuring that prosecutors remain the decision-makers [10]. - There is a push for improving the rights of lawyers through a comprehensive mechanism for document review, ensuring that legal practitioners can effectively uphold their clients' rights and maintain judicial fairness [10].