Group 1 - The Jiangsu Provincial High People's Court reported that in 2025, the province is expected to receive 2.6968 million new cases and conclude 2.5461 million cases, with judges averaging 363.4 cases resolved each, maintaining a leading position nationally in trial and enforcement work [1] - The court has implemented 20 judicial measures to strengthen the strictest protection of intellectual property rights, including punitive damages in 84 cases to deter infringement [3] - The court has ruled against restrictive insurance clauses that discriminate against private hospitals, concluding 233,200 commercial cases with a total amount of 190.119 billion yuan, promoting a fairer business environment [4] Group 2 - The court has strengthened international judicial cooperation, resolving foreign-related commercial disputes involving parties from 110 countries, with 92 cases where foreign parties chose Jiangsu courts for jurisdiction [5] - The court has taken measures to protect ecological and cultural heritage along the Grand Canal, holding accountable those involved in illegal sand mining and facilitating the orderly progress of renewable energy projects [6] - The court has actively addressed social stability issues, punishing serious crimes and fraud, including a case where a group defrauded over 5.3 billion yuan from more than 3,000 individuals [7] Group 3 - The court has ruled in a high-profile case regarding the invalidation of gifts based on improper relationships, ordering the return of misused joint property, and has addressed issues related to high bride prices and marriage agency misconduct [8]

Core Viewpoint - The report highlights the achievements and initiatives of the Zhenjiang Intermediate People's Court in enhancing judicial efficiency and serving the public, with a focus on case resolution and community engagement [3][5][6]. Group 1: Judicial Efficiency and Case Management - In 2025, Zhenjiang courts received 102,367 new cases and concluded 98,225 cases, with judges averaging 294 cases each, and grassroots judges averaging 331 cases [3]. - All judicial execution quality indicators met standards, showing significant optimization in performance [3]. - The court's initiatives in family trial reforms and collaborative dispute resolution were recognized and promoted by the Supreme People's Court nationwide [3]. Group 2: Crime Prevention and Public Safety - The court actively combats serious violent crimes, with 752 cases of theft and fraud concluded, including a significant case involving 20 defendants who defrauded over 3,000 people of 5.3 billion yuan [5]. - There was a 25.59% year-on-year decrease in minor crime cases, contributing to an increased sense of safety among the public [5]. Group 3: Economic Development and Corporate Support - The "Precise Restructuring to Promote Enterprise Renewal" project attracted over 1 billion yuan in investment, aiding 25 companies in restructuring [6]. - The court emphasized strict protection of intellectual property rights, with a notable case involving software piracy recognized as a typical case of unfair competition [6]. - Engagement with private enterprises included 42 forums and visits to 189 companies, fostering a supportive environment for business operations [6]. Group 4: Community and Social Justice - The court resolved 3,626 family-related cases, enhancing the family trial mechanism to address public concerns effectively [8]. - Initiatives like "Law Assistance for Rural Areas" led to the resolution of 456 cases related to rural land transfer and industry development, supporting rural revitalization [8]. - The court executed 23,741 cases, recovering 61.22 billion yuan for successful claimants, demonstrating commitment to enforcing judicial decisions [8]. Group 5: Governance and Dispute Resolution - The establishment of comprehensive dispute resolution centers facilitated the mediation of 1,880 commercial disputes, with one case recognized as a national model [9]. - The court's efforts in combating telecom fraud included the conclusion of 340 related cases, showcasing a proactive approach to legal enforcement [9]. Group 6: Workforce Development and Training - The court implemented a "Four-Dimensional Integrated" training platform to enhance the political and legal capabilities of its staff [11]. - A total of 33 young judges were sent for practical training in various judicial settings, promoting talent development within the court system [11].