Core Viewpoint - The Jin Tang Court has focused on enhancing judicial services to support economic development, protect vulnerable groups, and promote ecological conservation during the "14th Five-Year Plan" period, aiming to ensure fairness and justice in every judicial case [6][12]. Judicial Support for Enterprises - The court has integrated bankruptcy trials into supply-side structural reforms to help struggling enterprises recover, establishing a bankruptcy dispute resolution team and a research base for bankruptcy law [7]. - Innovative approaches like "sale-type liquidation restructuring" have revived long-stalled projects, and the court has successfully utilized pre-restructuring procedures to address issues hindering enterprise operations [7]. Judicial Support for Vulnerable Groups - The court has developed the "Pea Pod·Golden Heart Nurturing Seed" brand for juvenile protection, ensuring comprehensive legal support for minors through a specialized case handling system [8]. - For elderly rights protection, the court has implemented measures such as on-site hearings and upgraded facilities to ease the legal process for seniors, demonstrating a commitment to safeguarding their rights [9]. Judicial Environmental Protection - The court has launched the "Golden Heart Nurturing Green" initiative to enhance ecological protection, hosting forums and establishing a judicial protection base for green manufacturing [10]. - Collaborative efforts with various entities have led to the establishment of a practical base for judicial protection of green manufacturing, directly supporting the development of low-carbon industries [10]. Multi-Party Dispute Resolution - The court has embraced the "Fengqiao Experience" to resolve conflicts at the grassroots level, collaborating with local governments and integrating community mediation into its operations [11]. - Initiatives like the "Baba Court" and partnerships with various departments have enhanced the court's role in social governance, improving the efficiency of dispute resolution [11].

在眉山市东坡区检察院，应勇调研民事检察、基层检察院建设等工作。他强调，民事执行事关人民群众 合法权益的实现。加强对民事执行活动的监督，重心在基层检察院。要巩固深化涉民事终本执行专项监 督成效，完善强化检察机关对民事执行活动全程监督机制，协同有效解决"执行难"问题。民事支持起诉 要紧扣"支持"定位，聚焦农民工、残疾人、老年人等诉讼能力受限的特定群体，让他们依法享有诉权、 有效行使诉权。要坚持把检力和资源向基层一线倾斜，加强基层检察院人员跨部门、跨条线统筹使用， 压实入额院领导办案责任，持续为基层减负、为基层赋能，让基层把更多精力放到抓落实和高质效办案 上。 在眉山市检察院，应勇调研高质效办案、检察管理等工作。他强调，高质效办好每一个案件，是目标也 是要求，最终目的是"努力让人民群众在每一个司法案件中感受到公平正义"。要充分发挥各级检察院积 极性创造性，探索建立一套从质效标准、操作规范到办案落实、结果评价的全流程全覆盖高质效办案工 作机制，把实体、程序、效果要求一体落到每一个案件和案件的每一个环节，全面提升检察机关法律监 督质效，健全检察环节司法公正实现和评价机制。要区分不同业务条线、不同案件类型，科学制定高质 ...

新京报讯(记者行海洋)记者12月4日从最高人民法院新闻发布会获悉，2024年，全国法院依法再审纠正 涉产权冤错案件46件72人，改判13人无罪。今年以来，对一批不应作为犯罪处理的涉企案件，依法宣告 无罪，或建议检察机关撤回起诉。 依法支持民营企业回款权利，促进政府诚信建设。王闯介绍，绝大多数民营企业属于中小企业，针对拖 欠中小企业账款问题，最高人民法院出台司法解释，明确规定大企业与中小企业约定以第三方付款为付 款前提的"背靠背"条款无效，防止大企业凭借优势地位欺压中小企业，依法保障民营企业账款得到及时 支付。 持续完善知识产权司法保护体系，保护新质生产力。王闯表示，人民法院加大对民营中小微企业原始创 新保护力度，促推创新成果转化。加大惩罚性赔偿适用力度，2024年，全国法院对恶意侵害知识产权情 节严重的460起案件适用惩罚性赔偿，同比增长44.2%。依法纠治诱导侵权、陷阱取证、非正常批量诉 讼等滥用权利行为，促进优化创新环境。区分恶意侵权与经营合作中发生的纠纷，对前者坚决依法严 惩，做实"严保护"，对后者则积极引导，以调解促合作、利发展。出台反垄断民事诉讼司法解释，规制 滥用市场支配地位、实施垄断协议等行为， ...

Core Points - The municipal political consultative conference members and some committee members conducted an inspection of the procuratorate's work, focusing on intellectual property judicial protection and the rights protection of new economy workers [1] - The inspection team visited the intellectual property judicial protection exhibition center in the Zhenjiang Economic Development Zone to understand the "Zhenzhi Yixing" cultural brand and typical case handling [1] - The Zhenjiang procuratorial authority reported on the city's procuratorial work, intellectual property judicial protection, and new economy workers' rights protection during a meeting [1] Group 1 - The municipal political consultative conference emphasized the need for the procuratorial authority to maintain a correct political direction in its work and to deepen reforms within the legal framework [1] - The focus should be on enhancing the protection of intellectual property and improving the rights of new economy workers [1] - Coordination between the political consultative conference's democratic supervision and the procuratorial authority's legal supervision is essential for modernizing the governance system and capabilities [1] Group 2 - The meeting was chaired by the vice chairman of the municipal political consultative conference, with participation from various officials and experts [1] - The discussion included contributions from representatives of the municipal market supervision bureau, science and technology bureau, human resources bureau, and experts from Jiangsu University and Jiangsu University of Science and Technology [1]

Group 1 - The Shanghai Municipal People's Congress held its 25th meeting, focusing on the judicial protection of intellectual property rights and the implementation of the Shanghai Huangpu Jiangsu Suzhou River Public Space Regulation [1] - The Shanghai High Court emphasized its role in enhancing the judicial environment for innovation and entrepreneurship, supporting the construction of a globally influential technology innovation center [1] - The Shanghai Procuratorate highlighted its efforts in advancing a comprehensive approach to intellectual property prosecution, aiming to safeguard high-level technological independence and strengthen Shanghai's position as an international intellectual property protection hub [1] Group 2 - During the afternoon inquiry session, nine members of the Municipal People's Congress raised questions regarding the development of waterfront public spaces, transportation, and the integration of culture, tourism, and sports [2] - The Deputy Mayor responded by emphasizing the importance of planning to create new advantages for high-quality development in waterfront areas and enhancing the quality of life for residents [2] - The meeting included discussions on improving law enforcement efficiency and the aesthetic appeal of waterfront spaces, with various municipal departments present to address the inquiries [2]

Group 1 - The Beijing Internet Court released information on the handling of artificial intelligence-related cases and reported on 8 typical cases [1] - The court emphasizes a human-centered approach and promotes the concept of "intelligent benevolence," while increasing incentives for innovation [1] - There is a call for enhanced judicial protection of intellectual property rights in the artificial intelligence sector, respecting the intellectual contributions of innovators [1] Group 2 - The Beijing Internet Court has jurisdiction over 11 specific types of internet-related civil and administrative cases within its district [1] - There has been a rapid increase in artificial intelligence-related cases, with disputes becoming more complex and diverse, primarily involving copyright ownership, infringement, network liability, and service contracts [1]

Core Viewpoint - The news highlights the efforts and achievements of various governmental bodies in Liaoning Province to optimize the business environment, focusing on law enforcement, judicial protection, and intellectual property rights [1]. Group 1: Law Enforcement Achievements - Liaoning's police have continuously conducted anti-crime operations, resulting in a 43.35% year-on-year decrease in the number of serious criminal cases that disrupt the business environment, with a 4.97% increase in the case resolution rate [3]. - A total of 308 cases related to economic crimes affecting enterprises were solved, leading to the arrest of 406 suspects, alongside the recovery of over 300 million yuan in tax funds through targeted operations against tax-related crimes [3]. Group 2: Judicial Actions - The Liaoning courts have adjudicated 729 first-instance cases related to crimes that disrupt market economic order this year, recovering 1.538 billion yuan in assets [4]. - The courts have conducted impact assessments on 276,800 enterprise-related cases and have implemented measures to revitalize enterprise assets, while also reducing the negative impact of credit punishment on businesses by 37.85% [4]. Group 3: Intellectual Property Protection - Liaoning's prosecutorial authorities have prosecuted 119 cases involving intellectual property crimes, assisting in recovering 3 million yuan in economic losses for rights holders [5]. - The region has expanded public interest litigation related to geographical indication agricultural products, promoting the high-quality development of local industries [5]. Group 4: Future Directions - The judicial authorities in Liaoning plan to continue optimizing the legal business environment to support comprehensive revitalization and contribute to the modernization of the province [6].

Group 1: Financial Technology Development - The Beijing Financial Technology and Professional Services Innovation Demonstration Zone, known as "Jin Ke New District," has attracted 266 financial technology companies with a total registered capital exceeding 140 billion yuan [4] - The district has established a complete industrial chain, gathering infrastructure, leading enterprises, professional service institutions, and small technology companies, enhancing its ecosystem [4][5] - The district's development focus has shifted from initial industrial aggregation to optimizing the industrial ecosystem and improving service capabilities, aiming for high-quality development [5] Group 2: Cultural and Historical Significance - The Xiangshan Revolutionary Memorial Hall has received over 1.9 million visitors since its opening in 2019, showcasing the history of the Communist Party's leadership in the arts [6] - The memorial hall has launched innovative educational practices, including a "Big Ideological and Political Class" education system, serving nearly 500 families and over 1,000 students and parents [7] Group 3: Water Resource Management - The South-to-North Water Diversion Project has transferred over 760 billion cubic meters of water, benefiting more than 185 million people, with 11.1 billion cubic meters directed to Beijing since 2014 [8] - Beijing's water supply relies on the South-to-North Water Diversion for 80%, while Tianjin relies entirely on it [8] Group 4: Intellectual Property Court Efficiency - The Beijing Intellectual Property Court has a case closure rate of 93% within the stipulated time, handling a wide range of cases, with 90% of cases being first-instance [10][11] - The court has implemented electronic and centralized reforms, significantly improving trial efficiency and reducing litigation costs, with online filing rates reaching 94% and online trial rates exceeding 85% [10][11]

Group 1 - The meeting of the municipal standing committee focused on various reports from the municipal government regarding the management of medical insurance funds, the implementation of laws related to small and medium enterprises, traditional Chinese medicine, property management in residential communities, and the management of state-owned assets for 2024 [2][3] - The standing committee reviewed and discussed the draft regulations on land compensation and resettlement, which were later approved pending review by the provincial standing committee [3] - Personnel appointments were made during the meeting, with new appointees taking an oath of office [4]

Core Viewpoint - The "Copyright AI Smart Review" application has significantly reduced copyright disputes in the textile market, with a reported decrease of 91.67% over three years, enhancing the business environment for enterprises [1][2]. Group 1: Application Impact - The "Copyright AI Smart Review" application integrates vast copyright data resources and enables real-time deep searches, allowing for quick tracing of design patterns with a response time of seconds [2]. - The application has led to a 33% annual decrease in case filings at the textile court, lowering compliance costs and operational uncertainties for merchants [2]. - The total transaction volume of China Textile City reached 400.987 billion RMB in 2024, demonstrating growth despite global economic challenges [2]. Group 2: Efficiency in Dispute Resolution - The application has improved the efficiency of resolving copyright disputes, reducing the average resolution time from four months to just one month [2]. - The "one-click tracing" feature of the application helps quickly identify the true rights holders, enhancing the handling efficiency of copyright disputes [2]. Group 3: Broader Implications - The application represents an innovative exploration of modernizing intellectual property judicial protection, with plans for further digitalization in intellectual property trials [3]. - Following successful trials, the application has expanded from the "Keqiao sample" to nationwide use, covering various fields such as photography, fine arts, and design [3]. - Data from the system indicates that over 66% of pattern checks revealed prior usage, highlighting the effectiveness of the application in identifying existing rights [3].