Core Insights - The article discusses the perception of time in the human brain, suggesting that it is not reliant on an internal clock but rather on interactions with the environment and behaviors [1][17][39] - David Robbe's research indicates that animals, such as rats, develop motor routines to estimate time, which aligns with Henri Bergson's philosophical concepts of time and memory [17][22][39] Group 1: David Robbe's Research - David Robbe conducts experiments to explore how the striatum in the brain may represent time perception through motor control [17][18] - In a treadmill experiment, rats exhibited superstitious behaviors to estimate time, indicating they do not have a true concept of time but rely on learned motor sequences [18][21] - The findings suggest that animals measure time through actions rather than an internal understanding, contrasting with human time perception [37][39] Group 2: Henri Bergson's Philosophy - Henri Bergson's ideas on time, particularly the concept of "durée," emphasize the qualitative, continuous flow of time as opposed to a quantifiable measure [27][39] - Bergson argues that our misunderstanding of time arises from spatializing it, which aligns with Robbe's findings that rats spatialize their actions to estimate time [22][29] - The article highlights the relevance of Bergson's philosophy in understanding the limitations of scientific approaches to time and consciousness [46][48] Group 3: Implications for Science and AI - The discussion raises questions about the nature of time in artificial intelligence, suggesting that AI lacks the continuous, subjective experience of time that living beings possess [41][42] - The article posits that the understanding of time and memory in neuroscience could benefit from integrating philosophical insights, particularly those of Bergson [46][48] - It emphasizes the need for a cross-disciplinary approach to explore the complexities of time perception and consciousness [48]