Core Viewpoint - The Supreme People's Court has released a third batch of typical cases related to bride price disputes, aiming to enhance the understanding of adjudication rules across various courts and promote family and social civilization through fair judgments [1] Group 1: Key Points on Bride Price Nature - Payments made for housing or vehicles with the intention of marriage can be treated as bride price according to adjudication rules [1] - Bride price varies by region, and courts should consider local customs, payment timing, methods, value, and the parties involved to determine its scope [1] - The judicial interpretation states that if one party gives substantial amounts like housing or vehicle payments for marriage purposes, these should be treated as bride price [1] Group 2: Case Summaries - In Case 1, a dispute over a car payment was resolved by determining it was given with the intention of marriage, thus qualifying as bride price, leading to a partial refund decision [2] - Case 2 involved multiple transfers between cohabiting parties, where the court ruled that the transfers were for shared living expenses, denying the request for refunds [3] - Case 4 highlighted a situation where a party was found guilty of fraud related to bride price, leading to criminal charges [4] - Case 5 clarified that in situations of long cohabitation without marriage registration, the court ruled against refunding bride price, aligning with judicial interpretation standards [5] Group 3: Judicial Attitudes - The court emphasizes a strict stance against obtaining property through marriage, requiring comprehensive assessments of the relationship context and behaviors of the parties involved [3] - The court will consider the duration of cohabitation and the circumstances surrounding marriage registration when evaluating claims for refunds [3]

Group 1 - The Supreme People's Court released five typical cases related to bride price disputes, aiming to deepen the understanding of judicial rules regarding such disputes and promote family and social civilization through fair adjudication [1] - In the case of Liu vs. Zhang, the court ruled that expenses incurred during the dating period are considered acts of affection and should not be adjusted by the judiciary, as the transfers were for mutual living expenses [1] - The court clarified that payments made for housing or vehicles with the intention of marriage can be treated as bride price and adjudicated accordingly, as seen in the case of Zhao vs. Li, where the court determined that the car payment had bride price characteristics [1] Group 2 - The cases emphasize the judicial stance against obtaining property through fraudulent marriage practices, as demonstrated in the case of Zheng vs. Wu, where the court supported the request for annulment and return of the bride price due to the short duration of cohabitation [2] - The case of Wang vs. Sun addressed situations where no marriage registration occurred but cohabitation lasted a significant time, ruling against the return of bride price by considering the duration of cohabitation, whether children were born, and the purpose of the bride price [2]

Group 1 - The Supreme People's Court released five typical cases related to bride price disputes, aiming to deepen the understanding of judicial rules regarding such disputes and promote family and social civilization through fair adjudication [1] - In the case of Liu vs. Zhang, the court ruled that expenses incurred during the dating period are considered acts of affection and should not be adjusted by the judiciary. Liu's request for the return of funds transferred to Zhang was denied as the transfers were deemed for mutual living expenses [1] - The case of Zhao vs. Li clarified that payments made for purchasing a house or car with the intention of marriage can be treated as bride price under judicial rules. The court ordered Li to return a portion of the car payment made by Zhao, as it was established that the payment was made with marriage in mind [2] Group 2 - The case of Zheng vs. Wu highlighted the prohibition of obtaining property through fraudulent marriage practices. The court supported Zheng's request to annul the marriage and return the full bride price, given the short duration of cohabitation and Wu's refusal to live together [2] - The case of Wang vs. Sun addressed disputes involving bride price where no marriage registration occurred but the couple had cohabited for a significant period. The court decided not to require the return of the bride price, considering the length of cohabitation, whether children were born, and the purpose of the bride price as key factors [3]

Core Viewpoint - The Supreme People's Court of China has released five typical cases related to bride price disputes, aiming to enhance the understanding of judicial rules regarding such disputes and promote family and social civilization through fair adjudication [1]. Group 1: Clarification of Bride Price and Related Financial Transactions - The case "Liu vs. Zhang" clarifies that expenses incurred during a romantic relationship are considered acts of affection and should not be subject to judicial adjustment. Liu's request for the return of funds transferred to Zhang was denied as the transfers were deemed to be for shared living expenses [1]. - The ruling indicates that payments made for purchasing a house or car with the intention of marriage can be treated as bride price and adjudicated accordingly. In the case "Zhao vs. Li," the court recognized the car purchase as having bride price characteristics, leading to a partial refund decision based on various factors [1]. Group 2: Judicial Stance on Fraudulent Marriage Practices - The cases emphasize a strict judicial stance against fraudulent practices in marriage, such as marriage scams. In "Zheng vs. Wu," despite the marriage registration, the court supported Zheng's request for divorce and full return of the bride price due to the short duration of cohabitation [2]. - The case "Wang vs. Sun" addresses situations where couples have lived together for an extended period without formal marriage registration, ruling against the return of bride price. The court considered the length of cohabitation, whether children were born, and the purpose of the bride price as key factors in balancing interests [2].