长达八年的拉锯战。 然而，合资项目的宏伟蓝图如今已沦为空壳。评估停滞、量产未果、管理模糊、研发失败等问题频发， 长达八年拉锯战，不仅耗尽了双方的资源与耐心，更是击碎了日照的乘用车造车梦。 争议初显 2020年11月23日，日照高新区管委会的会议室里，积压已久的矛盾彻底爆发。 "未来的收益你得实现才可以，但如果未来实现不了，你得把股份给我扣回来！"一位日照高新区相关人 士说。 "未来的东西怎么能评那么准？谁是神仙，出了责任要承担，吓住人家（评估机构）了。"中兴汽车总经 理肖伟反驳称。 这段正面交锋，是日照中兴汽车有限公司（下称"合资公司"）八年造车停摆的缩影。 2017年，河北中兴汽车制造有限公司（下称"中兴汽车"）终止了与广汽的合作，亟需将乘用车产品的生 产基地从宜昌转移；而日照高新区也正在寻觅合适的造车项目。 双方一拍即合，前者提供技术和产品，后者的金融平台日照高新发展集团有限公司（下称"高发集团"） 提供生产厂房及资金，合资合作协议很快便签订了下来，合资公司随之成立，目标则是打造"日照市第 一家整车制造厂"。 2017年年底，在合资公司成立后不久，双方的资产注入就遇到了一些客观挑战： 一是，原计划用于快速 ...

Group 1 - The company, Wanda Information, is a mixed-ownership enterprise with state capital participation [1] - China Life Insurance, which is a publicly listed company, is the largest shareholder of Wanda Information [1]

Core Viewpoint - The resignation of Zong Fuli from her position as chairwoman of Wahaha Group has raised questions about the company's ownership structure and the implications of her departure on the company's governance and control [1][4]. Group 1: Company Ownership Structure - Wahaha Group is classified as a mixed-ownership enterprise rather than a state-owned enterprise, as the state-owned capital does not exceed half of the board members and lacks controlling power [4][11]. - Zong Fuli holds a 29.4% stake in Wahaha, while Hangzhou Wen Shang Lv holds 46%, and the employee stockholding committee holds 24.6%, giving Zong Fuli significant decision-making power through a unified action agreement [4][10]. - The state-owned capital in Wahaha does not contribute financially, which means it does not receive dividends, reinforcing the notion that Wahaha is primarily a private enterprise controlled by the Zong family [10][11]. Group 2: Historical Context - Wahaha's origins trace back to a school-run enterprise in Hangzhou, where Zong Qinghou took over a loss-making distribution department in 1987 and later established the first product, Wahaha Children's Nutritional Liquid, in collaboration with Zhejiang University [7][9]. - The initial funding for Wahaha came from a loan and sales revenue, indicating that the company was built on private capital rather than state investment [7][10].