Core Viewpoint - Liu Qiangdong emphasized that JD's evaluation and ranking systems will never be commercialized, asserting that businesses should not prioritize profit above all else [1] Group 1 - Liu Qiangdong stated that if rankings are monetized, they will lose their authenticity, as good brands do not need to pay for their positions [1] - He highlighted that companies willing to pay for rankings are likely to be inferior or of lower quality [1] - The implication is that a genuine ranking system should reflect true quality rather than financial influence [1]

Core Viewpoint - JD Group's founder Liu Qiangdong emphasizes the commitment to the principle of "never commercializing" its review and ranking services, arguing that charging merchants would undermine authenticity and fairness, leading to industry chaos where "bad money drives out good" [1] Group 1 - Liu Qiangdong states that the review and ranking services will never be commercialized, highlighting the public nature of these services [1] - The pursuit of profit is acceptable for a business, but the company will not monetize every aspect of its operations [1] - Charging for reviews and rankings would compromise their objectivity and integrity, which are essential for consumer trust [1] Group 2 - Liu Qiangdong critiques the potential paradox of commercialized rankings, noting that typically, only lower-ranked and questionable quality brands would pay for better positioning [1] - He argues that if a payment mechanism is established, it would lead to a loss of fairness and credibility in the ranking system [1] - The company aims to maintain the authenticity and fairness of its information by avoiding profit-driven motives in its review and ranking services [1]