Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the escalation of protests in California due to Trump's strong immigration policies, leading to a significant military response and highlighting the deep political divide between the Republican and Democratic parties [1][5][17]. Group 1: Protests and Government Response - Large-scale protests erupted in California as a result of Trump's administration enforcing strict immigration policies, leading to violent clashes between federal agents and local residents [1][3]. - In response to the chaos, Trump ordered the deployment of 2,000 National Guard troops to Los Angeles to restore order, showcasing a rapid and forceful reaction to the unrest [3][5]. - The situation escalated to the point where Trump's Defense Secretary warned of potential deployment of regular military forces if violence continued, indicating a readiness to use military power to control the situation [3][5]. Group 2: Political Context and Military Control - The conflict reflects a longstanding ideological battle between Trump's Republican Party, which advocates for strict border control, and California's Democratic leadership, which has historically supported more lenient immigration policies [5][17]. - Trump's actions are seen as a test of his control over the military, especially after previous tensions with military leadership during his first term, where he felt his authority was undermined [5][7]. - The swift federal takeover of the California National Guard's command indicates a lack of strong resistance from the Democratic leadership, contrasting with previous instances where state forces resisted federal control [8][14]. Group 3: Comparison with International Context - The article draws a comparison with South Korean President Yoon Suk-yeol, who faced political challenges but failed to assert military control, unlike Trump, who successfully commanded military loyalty [10][12][14]. - Trump's ability to mobilize military forces without internal opposition marks a significant difference in political dynamics compared to Yoon's experience, suggesting a more consolidated power structure under Trump [14][15]. Group 4: Implications and Future Outlook - Analysts suggest that Trump's motivations may extend beyond immigration issues, potentially aiming to undermine the autonomy of Democratic states and pave the way for broader policy changes [17][21]. - The current situation is viewed as a dangerous escalation in U.S. political conflict, with Trump's military actions potentially deepening societal divisions and international isolation [19][21]. - The reliance on military force to manage domestic unrest raises concerns about the long-term stability of U.S. governance and its implications for both domestic and international relations [19][21].