Core Viewpoint - The article highlights the safety hazards associated with low-priced rice cookers, revealing that only a small fraction of popular models pass safety tests, raising concerns about consumer health and product quality [2][5][9]. Group 1: Product Testing and Safety - A recent evaluation of 16 popular rice cookers found that only 5 passed all safety tests, resulting in a pass rate of less than 32% [5][9]. - The main issues identified were the excessive migration of harmful substances from plastic and metal components, particularly in low-priced models [5][10]. - The article emphasizes the importance of ensuring that harmful chemical substances and heavy metals remain within safe limits during cooking [5][6]. Group 2: Market Dynamics and Consumer Behavior - The rice cooker market is highly concentrated, with major brands like Midea, Supor, and Joyoung holding over 60% market share, while low-priced white-label products proliferate due to lower quality standards [9][10]. - Many consumers are misled by e-commerce platforms that prioritize low prices, resulting in a surge in sales of low-quality rice cookers [11][12]. - The article suggests that consumer choices are often influenced by misleading marketing tactics and algorithms that promote low-priced items without regard for quality [12][13]. Group 3: Industry Response and Quality Assurance - In response to the identified issues, JD.com has launched a quality assessment initiative called "Avoid雷情报局" to transparently present product testing results to consumers [5][14]. - JD.com has established a dedicated quality testing laboratory to ensure rigorous evaluation of kitchen appliances, including rice cookers, and to maintain high standards above industry norms [18][20]. - The initiative aims to empower consumers with reliable information, thereby enhancing their purchasing decisions and promoting quality consumption [20][23].