Group 1 - The core viewpoint emphasizes the necessity of establishing a layered and categorized responsibility system to ensure that party organizations and members understand, assume, and fulfill their responsibilities [1] - It highlights the importance of clear delineation of responsibilities among various levels of party organizations, including the primary responsibility of party secretaries and the supervisory role of discipline inspection commissions [1][3] - The article stresses the need for a precise and scientific accountability mechanism to ensure that responsibilities are effectively implemented at all levels [1] Group 2 - The "Chinese Communist Party Disciplinary Regulations" stipulate that failure to fulfill the responsibility of strict governance of the party can lead to warnings or severe warnings, and in serious cases, removal from party positions [2] - The regulations emphasize the importance of accountability for party organizations and leading cadres, particularly focusing on the responsibilities of the main leaders [3][6] - The article outlines the evolution of disciplinary regulations, indicating that the emphasis on political discipline has increased over time, reflecting a more comprehensive approach to party governance [4] Group 3 - The article defines the key subjects of responsibility as party organizations and leading cadres, indicating that the focus is on the "key minority" responsible for strict governance of the party [6] - It clarifies that the failure to fulfill responsibilities must be objectively evident, distinguishing between intentional non-fulfillment and inadequate performance of duties [7] - The article also discusses the necessity of serious consequences resulting from such failures, which must significantly harm the party's interests or image [8][9] Group 4 - The subjective aspect of disciplinary violations can be either intentional or negligent, with intentional actions leading to more severe consequences [10] - It emphasizes the interdependence of the main responsibility of party committees and the supervisory responsibility of discipline inspection commissions, highlighting that both are essential for effective governance [11] - The article differentiates between failures in strict governance of the party and general negligence in work responsibilities, noting the political implications of the former [11]