中经记者 吴清 北京报道 在历经三年的对抗互诉后，京东方（BOE）和三星专利大战在最后一刻迎来和解。 12月15日，据韩国业界媒体披露，京东方与三星显示宣布，就历时近三年的OLED专利及商业秘密诉讼 达成全面和解，并联合向美国国际贸易委员会（ITC）提交终止相关调查的申请。 回溯这场纠纷，其始于2022年年底，升级于2023年，激化于2025年年中，并在ITC即将作出终裁前戏剧 性收场。多位业内人士向《中国经营报》记者表示，随着双方握手言和，全球显示产业的竞争逻辑正 从"你死我活、赢者通吃"的零和博弈，转向"技术共享、利益共赢"的竞合新阶段。 专利拉锯战最后一刻达成和解 京东方与三星始于2022年的专利战，本质是一场关于未来显示技术主导权的争夺。 早在2022年12月，三星显示率先发难，向ITC提起337调查，指控京东方侵犯其四项与OLED显示面板相 关的专利，涉及像素电路结构、驱动方式等核心技术。2023年年初，三星进一步加码，一方面在ITC追 加商业秘密侵权指控，声称京东方通过前三星员工跳槽获取关键工艺参数与良率优化经验；另一方面， 在美国得克萨斯州东区法院提起专利侵权诉讼。 作为回应，京东方并未退缩，而 ...

Core Viewpoint - Strengthening judicial protection of intellectual property rights is essential for improving the property protection system and is an inherent requirement for promoting high-quality economic development and building a higher-level open economic system in China [1] Group 1: Mediation as a Priority - The Shangqiu Intermediate People's Court prioritizes mediation as the first option for resolving intellectual property disputes, effectively moving the resolution process forward [2] - The court actively informs and guides parties to choose mediation during the filing stage, highlighting its efficiency, low cost, and benefits for normal business operations [2] - The automatic compliance rate for disputes resolved through mediation has reached 100% [2] Group 2: Collaborative Dispute Resolution - The court collaborates with the Shangqiu Intellectual Property Bureau to create a new path for dispute resolution that emphasizes information sharing and efficient cooperation [3] - Administrative mediation agreements that comply with legal requirements can be directly submitted to the court for judicial confirmation, enhancing the authority and attractiveness of administrative mediation [3] - The court has successfully implemented collaborative mediation with other courts, significantly increasing the success rate of dispute resolution [3] Group 3: Exemplary Judgments - The court utilizes typical cases to guide dispute resolution, aiming for efficient resolution of similar cases [4] - In the first seven months of 2025, the court published 12 typical intellectual property cases, which effectively improved the success rate of mediation for batch cases [4] - The court ensures that judicial documents are well-reasoned and clear, providing a benchmark for similar cases and helping mediators guide parties in assessing their claims rationally [4]