Workflow
矿产资源开发整合
icon
Search documents
矿产资源开发利用整合,谨防过度使用行政手段|记者观察
Di Yi Cai Jing· 2025-05-19 04:24
Core Viewpoint - The shift from "land finance" to "mineral finance" by local governments to alleviate fiscal pressure raises concerns about market distortion and the potential negative impact on private mining enterprises [1][3]. Group 1: Government Actions - Local governments are transitioning to mineral finance due to declining land transfer revenues amid real estate market adjustments and urbanization slowdowns [1]. - Some local governments are requiring private mining companies to accept state-owned investment platforms as shareholders or controlling entities to obtain or renew mining rights [1][2]. - A specific case shows a state-owned enterprise controlling seven mining companies, with eight having a 51% or greater stake [1]. Group 2: Industry Impact - Private mining companies report that they are pressured to allow state-owned companies to take control in exchange for mining rights, leading to a lack of investment security and innovation [3]. - The practice of linking mining rights renewal to state capital participation is seen as a violation of anti-monopoly laws and undermines the legal protections for private enterprises [3][4]. Group 3: Regulatory Concerns - Experts warn that the current practices contradict the principles of the new Mineral Resources Law, which aims to protect property rights and ensure fair competition [3][4]. - There is a noted double standard in environmental enforcement, where private companies face stricter regulations compared to state-owned enterprises [3]. Group 4: Recommendations - To address these issues, it is suggested that the government should adhere to the rule of law, establish fair competition in mining rights allocation, and create a transparent approval process [4]. - Encouraging technological innovation in private enterprises to reduce environmental costs is also recommended [4].