Core Viewpoint - The article emphasizes the importance of technological development in the context of China's "14th Five-Year Plan," highlighting the goal of significantly improving the level of technological self-reliance and innovation as a core national strategy [1] Group 1: Changes in the International Technology System - The current international technology system, which has been dominated by a single country for a long time, is facing significant challenges due to profound changes in global technological power dynamics and international development trends [2] - The public nature of technology rules is weakening, with an increasing trend towards tool-based approaches, as some countries impose export controls and compliance reviews, raising the costs of international technological collaboration [3] - The focus of international technological discourse is shifting from technical capabilities to rule-making and platform dominance, with a few Western countries controlling key academic evaluation systems and standards, limiting the influence of emerging technological powers [3] Group 2: Needs of Developing Countries - There is a rising demand from global South countries for fair and sustainable technological cooperation, as many developing nations face high entry barriers and unstable cooperation mechanisms in the context of rapid digitalization and intelligence [4] - If the international technology system continues to operate with high barriers and a closed nature, it will not only fail to meet the development needs of these countries but also hinder the long-term healthy development of the technology system [4] Group 3: China's Role in the International Technology System - In this context, China's stronger leadership in the international technology system is both necessary and reasonable, aiming to provide more open, compatible, and sustainable rules and platforms for international technological cooperation [4] - China has made significant advancements in several key areas, achieving global influence in certain technologies, indicating that it is no longer just a follower but a competitor in core fields [4] - The core challenge lies not only in technical capabilities but also in effectively translating these advantages into rule-making influence, necessitating active participation in standard-setting and governance [5][6]