Group 1 - The core issue highlighted is the excessive and detailed management requirements imposed on research projects, which can hinder innovation rather than support it [1][2] - Current management practices in research institutions are criticized for being overly bureaucratic and formalistic, which detracts from the original purpose of facilitating and supporting innovation [1] - There is a call for research management departments to adopt a more service-oriented approach, reducing unnecessary interference and allowing researchers to focus on their work [1][2] Group 2 - To alleviate the burden on researchers, it is essential to provide them with more trust and autonomy, alongside improving evaluation systems and establishing a negative list for research management [2] - Strengthening the integrity of research management is crucial, with strict consequences for violations related to the use and management of research funds [2] - Utilizing digital tools, such as shared information platforms and intelligent auditing, can significantly reduce redundant reporting and ineffective labor, thereby enhancing research efficiency [2]

Core Viewpoint - The article highlights the excessive and often absurd requirements imposed by research management departments on scientific projects, which detract from the actual research work and create unnecessary burdens for researchers [1][4]. Group 1: Issues in Research Management - There is an overemphasis on trivial details, such as the material of staples used in project documentation, which has no bearing on the quality or outcomes of the research [2][4]. - Researchers face frequent demands for progress reports, often with little time to show actual advancements, leading to frustration and inefficiency [3][4]. - The process of project evaluation is overly repetitive, with multiple rounds of assessments that add to the administrative burden rather than enhancing the research quality [3][5]. Group 2: Consequences of Rigid Management - The rigid adherence to compliance and formalities has transformed into a form of bureaucratic obstruction, hindering the flexibility and creativity essential for scientific inquiry [4][5]. - The management approach prioritizes avoiding mistakes over fostering an environment conducive to research, resulting in a culture of micromanagement that stifles innovation [5]. - There is a need for a paradigm shift in research management to allow for more flexibility and trust, reducing unnecessary requirements and respecting the unique nature of scientific work [5].