Core Viewpoint - The case of illegal crossing in the Qinling core protection area highlights the growing concern over ecological damage and safety risks associated with outdoor adventure activities in protected regions [1][2][3]. Ecological Impact - Illegal crossing activities have led to significant ecological damage, including soil compaction, vegetation trampling, water pollution, and disturbance of wildlife habitats [1][2]. - The presence of trash, such as plastic packaging and food waste, further harms the sensitive ecosystem, accelerating the degradation of fragile geological landscapes [1]. Safety Risks - The complex terrain and unpredictable weather in the Qinling region contribute to frequent safety incidents, with untrained adventurers facing risks such as hypothermia, getting lost, and altitude sickness [2]. - Rescue operations require substantial public resources and pose safety risks to rescue personnel [2]. Management Challenges - Current management efforts, including checkpoints and patrols, are often circumvented by violators using alternative routes and nighttime crossings [2][3]. - The proliferation of online guides and posts promoting illegal crossings complicates enforcement and increases the difficulty of managing these activities [2][3]. Underlying Factors - A lack of risk awareness among adventurers drives the trend of illegal crossings, with some seeking the thrill of conquering nature without understanding the associated dangers [3]. - Commercial interests from unqualified outdoor clubs and travel agencies exacerbate the issue by promoting illegal activities for profit, often neglecting participant qualifications and safety measures [3]. Regulatory Shortcomings - Existing laws provide insufficient deterrence against individual violations, primarily relying on minor fines and educational measures [3]. - The vastness of the Qinling area and the involvement of multiple management departments create challenges in coordination and effective oversight [3]. Media Influence - Media coverage often romanticizes adventure activities while downplaying the ecological damage and rescue costs, failing to provide adequate warnings and education [4]. Recommendations for Improvement - A comprehensive governance approach is suggested, including stricter legal enforcement and increased penalties for violators, such as blacklisting and financial accountability for rescue costs [5][6]. - Innovative monitoring technologies, such as satellite surveillance and drones, should be employed to enhance real-time oversight of protected areas [6]. - Development of safe, eco-friendly tourism alternatives is recommended to meet public demand for nature experiences while ensuring compliance with regulations [6]. - Continuous public education campaigns are essential to raise awareness about the importance of ecological protection and the risks of illegal activities [6].