立体化追责机制

Search documents
监管对财务造假动真格 年内12家公司触及重大违法强制退市
Zheng Quan Ri Bao· 2025-09-12 16:08
从公司基本面来看,2023年以来,公司连续大额亏损。据Wind数据统计,2023年至2024年,公司归母净利润分别-6.73亿 元、-5.76亿元;今年上半年,公司继续亏损,归母净利润为-0.55亿元。 本报记者 吴晓璐 据证监会网站9月12日消息,近日,证监会对深交所创业板上市公司北京东方通科技股份有限公司(以下简称"*ST东通") 涉嫌定期报告等财务数据存在虚假记载作出行政处罚事先告知。 经查,*ST东通连续四年虚增收入和利润,违反证券法律法规,证监会拟对上市公司罚款2.29亿元,对7名责任人合计罚款 4400万元,合计罚款2.73亿元,对实际控制人采取10年证券市场禁入。 证监会表示,*ST东通涉嫌触及重大违法强制退市情况,深交所将依法启动退市程序。对于可能涉及的犯罪线索,证监会 将坚持应移尽移的工作原则,按照相关规定移送公安机关。 据记者了解,*ST东通是今年第12家因财务造假而涉嫌触及重大违法强制退市的公司,年内触及重大违法强制退市的公司 数量创历年新高。在市场人士看来,今年以来,触及重大违法强制退市公司数量创新高,说明监管部门对财务造假动真格,形 成了强大的执法震慑,促使上市公司及其"关键少数"更 ...
上市公司高管频被查
Jin Rong Shi Bao· 2025-06-04 03:16
Core Viewpoint - The article highlights the increasing scrutiny and regulatory actions against key individuals in listed companies, reflecting a shift in regulatory philosophy from post-event punishment to a comprehensive governance approach that includes prevention, control, and accountability [1][5]. Regulatory Environment - Since April, nine listed companies have disclosed that their actual controllers and senior executives have been detained by supervisory authorities, while eleven others have received investigation notices from the China Securities Regulatory Commission (CSRC) [1][2]. - The regulatory focus has shifted from companies to key individuals, emphasizing personal accountability to curb risks such as financial fraud and insider trading [1][6]. Legal Implications - Detention measures are primarily related to serious job-related crimes, often involving bribery or collusion with public officials, and are not directly linked to the companies themselves [3][4]. - The increase in detentions indicates a strengthened crackdown on job-related crimes, particularly in maintaining a high-pressure stance against corruption [3][5]. Impact on Companies - The actions against key individuals may lead to concerns regarding corporate governance stability, financial authenticity, and compliance risks, potentially causing short-term stock price fluctuations [2][7]. - However, the relationship between stock price movements and the alleged misconduct is not always direct, as various factors can influence market reactions [7]. Investor Rights - Investors may seek to protect their rights if they can establish a connection between stock price declines and the companies' failure to disclose relevant information in a timely manner [7][8]. - Legal avenues exist for investors to claim damages due to false statements or nondisclosure, with potential compensation covering investment losses and associated costs [7][8].