Core Viewpoint - The termination of a significant computing power contract has led to a drastic drop in the stock price of Hainan Huatie, highlighting the risks associated with speculative contracts in the computing power industry [3][6][9] Group 1: Contract Termination and Market Reaction - Hainan Huatie's stock opened at a limit down of 8.71 yuan per share, with a sell order amount exceeding 14 billion yuan following the announcement of the contract termination [3] - The computing power service agreement signed with Hangzhou X Company in March 2025 was valued at 3.69 billion yuan, accounting for 70% of the company's projected revenue for 2024 [5][9] - The stock price surged from an average of 4.76 yuan to a peak of 13.26 yuan after the contract announcement, increasing the number of shareholders from 46,000 to 220,000 [5][6] Group 2: Company’s Financial Position and Contract Details - The company claimed that the contract termination did not materially affect its financial status, despite the contract's projected capital expenditure exceeding 2 billion yuan, which would have significantly impacted its financials [7][9] - The contract was characterized as a framework agreement rather than a binding contract, lacking essential terms such as prepayment mechanisms and specific delivery schedules [8][9] - The identity of the "mysterious party" Hangzhou X Company remains undisclosed, raising questions about the legitimacy of the contract [7][8] Group 3: Regulatory Response and Future Prospects - The Shanghai Stock Exchange issued a regulatory letter on the same day as the contract termination announcement, indicating a swift response to the situation [8] - Despite the termination of the 3.69 billion yuan contract, Hainan Huatie continues to pursue other computing power collaborations, including a 1 billion yuan agreement with Anhui Haima Cloud Technology, which also lacks clear terms and has not resulted in actual orders [9]

更值得玩味的是，公司刻意选择国庆长假前披露解约消息，使投资者陷入"长假期间无法交易"的被动局面，进一步放大市场焦虑对投资者而言，这份曾被 视为转型标杆的合同，最终沦为"纸上富贵"，市场用脚投票自然成为必然。 第二大股东胡丹锋的"减持改增持"更像危机公关的应急补丁——其8月计划减持2.22%股份（对应套现约4.85亿元），却在合同解约当晚紧急终止减持并宣 布增持3000万至5000万元。此举表面宣称"基于对公司价值的认可"，实则难掩维稳意图。合同签署期间股价翻倍的涨幅，已为股东创造了潜在减持空间， 而在利空冲击下，增持承诺成为缓解市场恐慌的最低成本选择，其"高抛低吸"的嫌疑更引发投资者质疑。更值得警惕的是，牛散章建平在一季度股价飙升 时跻身前十大股东，二季度股价回落时已悄然退出，与股东增减持节奏形成"默契"。 "未对财务状况产生实质影响"的说法则自相矛盾。公司声称协议签订以来未收到任何采购订单，未产生实际采购成本或资本性支出，未对财务状况产生实 质影响。但回溯签约时的公告可见，该合同对应的资本支出预计超20亿元，占当时净资产的33%以上，且需通过借贷筹集——而公司彼时货币资金仅3.14 亿元，有息负债却超120 ...