Group 1 - The meeting focused on the standardization and normalization of administrative review processes, aiming to establish a foundation for the "same case, same judgment, unified standards" mechanism [1] - A typical case database for administrative review will be established, with 12 outstanding administrative reviewers selected to form four specialized groups focusing on public security, traffic, urban construction, and social security [1] - The case quality evaluation mechanism will be optimized, with a new "cloud-based asynchronous interactive evaluation mechanism" to ensure thorough and rigorous case assessments [1] Group 2 - The meeting also addressed the assessment of administrative review matters and the usage of the online case handling system [1]

Group 1 - The Supreme People's Court has disclosed that it is addressing key issues in judicial practice by incorporating authoritative cases into the court's case database, which clarifies legal application standards and judgment rules, promoting the principle of "same case, same judgment" [1][2] - A notable case involving the "return ten times" punitive compensation for expired salted duck eggs has been included in the case database, providing precise references for judges and ensuring the correct and unified application of law [1][3] - The "return ten times" rule established by the Food Safety Law applies to businesses that produce or operate food that does not meet safety standards, with a minimum compensation amount set at 1,000 yuan if the increased compensation is less than that [1] Group 2 - The establishment of a case retrieval platform by the People's Court aims to ensure judicial fairness by providing authoritative references for judges and promoting equal treatment in similar cases [2] - Local courts are utilizing the case database to enhance community service and social governance, such as providing reference answers for mediators and reducing the occurrence of similar disputes through proactive measures [2] - The Central Committee's directive emphasizes the importance of improving the guiding case system and building a high-quality case database to enhance the effectiveness of unified legal application and promote conflict resolution [3]