Group 1 - The core viewpoint emphasizes the importance of legal protection for the private economy, highlighting the role of judicial actions in safeguarding market order and consumer safety [1][3][4] - A special action named "Protecting Medicine and Ensuring Public Safety" was launched, resulting in the investigation of over 10 cases of counterfeit registered trademark medicines, with 11 cases prosecuted involving 13 individuals, recovering over 20 million yuan for affected companies [3][4] - The initiative aims to institutionalize and normalize such actions, enhancing collaboration among various stakeholders to optimize the business environment [4] Group 2 - The focus on juvenile protection involves a collaborative approach among judicial, family, and social sectors to create a supportive environment for minors [6][7] - The establishment of a comprehensive protection platform for minors integrates judicial protection, family education guidance, and social assistance, addressing parental challenges in managing children's behavior [6][7] - A vocational training base for minors has been set up, offering skills training and job placement services, demonstrating a commitment to reintegrating youth into society [7] Group 3 - The protection of red resources is highlighted as a crucial task, with ongoing efforts to monitor and safeguard historical sites related to revolutionary history [9][10] - The local prosecutor's office has taken action against inappropriate activities at memorial sites, emphasizing the need for strict management and public awareness [10] - There is a call for increased public participation in the protection of red resources to ensure the legacy of revolutionary history is preserved [9][10] Group 4 - The focus on wildlife protection has led to the prosecution of illegal hunting cases, with significant numbers of protected bird species involved [12][13] - The judicial actions taken have resulted in the successful release of rehabilitated wildlife and the collection of ecological restoration fees, showcasing the effectiveness of public interest litigation [12][13] - There is a push for enhanced collaboration among enforcement agencies to strengthen wildlife protection efforts and raise public awareness [13] Group 5 - The establishment of a tiered intervention system for juvenile offenders aims to provide tailored rehabilitation services based on the severity of their actions [15][16] - Collaborative efforts with various local agencies have been initiated to support the development of a comprehensive approach to juvenile justice and social work [15][16] - The initiative seeks to create a conducive legal and social environment for the healthy growth of minors, emphasizing the importance of proactive measures in preventing juvenile crime [16]

Core Viewpoint - The Supreme People's Procuratorate is actively promoting public interest litigation to protect red resources and the legacy of heroes, emphasizing the importance of safeguarding historical perspectives and cultural heritage [1][2]. Group 1: Public Interest Litigation Activities - From 2023 to mid-2025, a total of 2,243 public interest litigation cases related to the protection of heroes, red artifacts, and revolutionary sites have been handled, including 83 cases specifically in the anti-Japanese war sector, protecting the honor of 49 heroes [1]. - The Supreme People's Procuratorate has initiated a special supervision work focusing on the protection of red resources, including memorial facilities and artifacts related to anti-Japanese heroes, utilizing technology to enhance legal supervision [2]. Group 2: Future Directions and Strategies - The procuratorial authorities will focus on issues such as the infringement of heroes' reputations, management deficiencies of memorial facilities, and inadequate protection of red sites, increasing case handling intensity to ensure strict legal protection [5]. - The Supreme People's Procuratorate plans to enhance professional and standardized research in the field of red resource protection, issuing guidelines for specific areas of public interest litigation to improve case handling quality and effectiveness [5].