Core Points - The Supreme People's Court has released 12 typical cases to protect the legitimate rights and interests of private enterprises and entrepreneurs, aiming to optimize the legal environment for the healthy and high-quality development of the private economy [1][2] - The cases emphasize equal legal protection principles, encouraging innovation among researchers and guiding private enterprises to operate in a standardized manner [1] - The court ruled against a hospital's defense in a contract dispute, affirming that the hospital must pay a private company for overdue payments, highlighting the enforcement of contractual obligations [1] - In another case, a "back-to-back" payment clause favoring large enterprises over small and medium-sized enterprises was deemed invalid, reinforcing the protection of small private enterprises' rights [1] - A case involving bribery by a business development manager in an internet company illustrates the judiciary's strict stance against corruption in emerging sectors, serving as a warning to internet enterprise employees [1] - The Supreme Court emphasizes the importance of truthful evaluations in product assessments within the internet economy, holding evaluators accountable for disseminating false information that could harm businesses [2] - The court aims to continue enforcing fair and just judicial practices to protect the rights of private enterprises and promote the healthy development of the private economy [2]

Group 1 - The Supreme People's Court has released 12 typical cases to protect the legitimate rights and interests of private enterprises and entrepreneurs, aiming to optimize the legal environment for the healthy and high-quality development of the private economy [1][2] - The cases emphasize equal legal protection principles, encouraging innovation among researchers and supporting private enterprises in expanding internationally [1] - In a contract dispute case, the court ruled that a hospital's argument for not paying a private company due to fiscal funding constraints was invalid, ordering the hospital to pay the owed amount and overdue interest [1] Group 2 - In a bribery case involving a business development manager from an internet company, the court highlighted the issue of "small power, big corruption," sentencing the individual for accepting bribes, which serves as a warning to internet industry employees [2] - The court recognized the importance of truthful evaluations in the internet economy, ruling that a network evaluator who published false information infringed on a company's reputation and should bear liability [2] - The Supreme Court reiterated its commitment to fair and strict judicial practices to protect the rights of private enterprises and promote the healthy development of the private economy [2]