当下，产品测评是互联网经济下的一种市场评价方式。测评人发表的言论应基于其真实的测评结果，并 对转载的信息尽到合理注意义务，避免虚假的测评信息错误引导舆论，侵害生产者、经营者的名誉权， 扰乱健康的市场秩序。"某终端公司与江某网络侵权责任纠纷案"认定，网络测评人发布虚假测评信息侵 犯企业名誉权的，应承担侵权责任，对规制网络虚假测评行为，保障企业的合法权益具有积极意义。 在"某公司与某医院买卖合同纠纷案"中，人民法院认定某医院以其需支付货款的来源为财政资金、受财 政审批流程限制未按期付款、不应承担违约责任的抗辩理由不能成立，判令某医院给付民企某公司货款 及逾期付款利息。"某电缆公司与某建设公司、朱某龙买卖合同纠纷案"认定，合同中约定大型企业在收 到第三方支付的款项后再向中小企业付款的"背靠背"条款无效，依法保障中小民营企业合法权益。 在"刘某非国家工作人员受贿案"中，被告人刘某作为互联网公司的业务发展经理，为他人在提供流量扶 持等方面予以帮助，收取行贿款数百万元，表现出"小权力、大腐败"特点。人民法院依法认定，刘某构 成非国家工作人员受贿罪并判处刑罚，充分体现了司法机关对新兴领域犯罪严惩不贷、绝不姑息的鲜明 态度， ...

Group 1 - The Supreme People's Court has released 12 typical cases to protect the legitimate rights and interests of private enterprises and entrepreneurs, aiming to optimize the legal environment for the healthy and high-quality development of the private economy [1][2] - The cases emphasize equal legal protection principles, encouraging innovation among researchers and supporting private enterprises in expanding internationally [1] - In a contract dispute case, the court ruled that a hospital's argument for not paying a private company due to fiscal funding constraints was invalid, ordering the hospital to pay the owed amount and overdue interest [1] Group 2 - In a bribery case involving a business development manager from an internet company, the court highlighted the issue of "small power, big corruption," sentencing the individual for accepting bribes, which serves as a warning to internet industry employees [2] - The court recognized the importance of truthful evaluations in the internet economy, ruling that a network evaluator who published false information infringed on a company's reputation and should bear liability [2] - The Supreme Court reiterated its commitment to fair and strict judicial practices to protect the rights of private enterprises and promote the healthy development of the private economy [2]