本文为深度编译，仅供交流学习，不代表日新说观点 一通看似寻常的电话，竟成为压垮印度总理纳伦德拉·莫迪对美国总统唐纳德·特朗普耐心的最后一根稻草。电话那头传来的并非善意的鼓励或合作的信号， 而是充满自我吹嘘的言辞。这通关于诺贝尔奖的对话，不仅没有如过去那样加深"兄弟情"，反而彻底揭开了两人关系里长期潜藏的裂痕。曾经密不可分、在 国际舞台上相互呼应的盟友，如今却走向分道扬镳的境地。 事情的导火索，源于特朗普屡次在公开场合兴高采烈地宣称，他本人成功"解决"了印巴军事冲突。在特朗普看来，这场延续七十余年的复杂争端仿佛只需他 一句话就能化解。但在现实中，冲突背后的历史与政治纠葛极其深重。根据知情人士透露，6月17日那次关键电话中，特朗普再次提及此事，并得意洋洋地 暗示：巴基斯坦可能会因为他的"斡旋"而提名他角逐诺贝尔和平奖。他甚至在言语中透露出一种期待——希望莫迪效仿，为他助力。 然而，莫迪的反应异常强硬。他当即表示，美国与这次停火没有任何关系，完全是印度与巴基斯坦直接沟通的成果。对于特朗普的"邀功"，莫迪不仅拒绝认 可，还刻意避开有关诺贝尔奖的所有讨论。这种直截了当的回应，成为两人关系迅速恶化的关键节点。对于莫迪而言 ...

Group 1 - India has taken a firm stance against the U.S. by responding to tariff threats with strong countermeasures, showcasing its determination to protect national interests [1][3] - The U.S. imposed a 25% tariff on Indian goods, raising the total tariff rate to 50%, one of the highest globally, citing national security concerns related to India's import of Russian oil [1][3] - India has suspended arms purchases from the U.S. and is increasing military cooperation with Russia, indicating a shift in defense strategy that could impact the U.S. military-industrial complex [1][3] Group 2 - The Indian government has taken action against U.S. investment firm Jane Street, imposing a ban and seizing approximately 48.7 billion INR (around 484 million USD) in profits, which could hinder U.S. financial capital expansion in international markets [1][3] - The deterioration of U.S.-India relations is attributed to high tariffs, differing stances on the Ukraine crisis, and India's commitment to maintaining its sovereignty and strategic partnerships, particularly with Russia [1][3] - The ongoing conflict between the U.S. and India serves as a warning to other nations about the volatility of international relations in a globalized context, emphasizing the need for countries to navigate their interests carefully [1][3]