Core Points - Recent court rulings have declared several actions by the Trump administration illegal, including the freezing of research funds for Harvard University, the deployment of military forces in Los Angeles, and the imposition of tariffs on multiple countries [1][3][6] Group 1: Court Rulings - The Massachusetts federal court ruled that the Trump administration's freezing of billions in federal research funds for Harvard University, under the pretext of combating anti-Semitism, violated the U.S. Constitution and ordered the government to unfreeze the funds [1] - The California Northern District federal court found the deployment of the National Guard and Marines in Los Angeles for law enforcement purposes to be unlawful, prohibiting the Trump administration from using military forces in California for such actions [3] - The U.S. Court of Appeals upheld a previous ruling that the emergency statute cited by Trump to impose tariffs on multiple countries did not authorize the majority of the tariffs [3] Group 2: Political Implications - The recent series of court decisions poses significant obstacles to the Trump administration's political agenda concerning tariffs, immigration, and education, indicating a growing conflict between the executive and judicial branches [6] - Analysts suggest that this escalating conflict is exacerbating political chaos and social division in the U.S., potentially leading to a constitutional crisis and creating substantial resistance to the implementation of Trump administration policies [6]

洛杉矶的街头硝烟未散，联邦政府的军队已整装待命——这场围绕非法移民的"战争"，正在将美国推向宪政危机的边缘。 街头冲突的升级进一步加剧了局势的失控。6月7日晚间，洛杉矶警方宣布全市进入战术警戒状态，11人因非法集会遭逮捕，抗议者与国民警卫队爆发激烈冲 突。中国记者在报道中不幸"中弹"，凸显局势的混乱。民主党则趁机将矛头指向特朗普，称其行动是"暴政的体现"，号召民众继续抗议。两党对立从国会辩 论蔓延至街头巷尾，美国社会撕裂愈发明显。 移民问题在美国本就是一根敏感的神经。拜登政府任期内宽松的移民政策导致大量新移民涌入，仅2022年后就有约500万非法移民进入美国，其中480万来自 墨西哥。他们填补了美国血汗工厂、保洁等行业的劳动力缺口，却也因身份问题成为社会矛盾的焦点。特朗普敏锐地抓住这一点，将移民问题推向极端，誓 言"每天抓捕3000名非法移民"，甚至要求移民局锁定服装厂、超市等目标实施突袭。这种强硬手段虽短期内可能提振共和党基本盘，却也让加州——这个民 主党的大本营——成为冲突的漩涡中心。 纽森的愤怒并非没有缘由。加州作为美国经济体量最大的州，贡献了全国近14%的GDP和15%的联邦税收。面对特朗普的"军事干 ...

Core Points - The Trump administration is facing over 200 lawsuits since taking office, primarily related to its tariff policies, immigration plans, and federal employee layoffs [1][2][5] - A coalition of 12 states has filed a lawsuit against the Trump administration, claiming its tariff policies are illegal and harmful to the economy [1][2] - The ongoing legal battles reflect a deepening conflict between the judicial and executive branches, contributing to political chaos and societal division in the U.S. [1][5][6] Tariff Policies - The Trump administration's tariff policies have led to multiple lawsuits from small businesses and state governments, with California's governor criticizing the actions as illegal and damaging to the economy [2][3] - The legal challenges against the tariff policies are part of a broader trend of increasing litigation against the Trump administration's actions [2][5] Immigration Policies - The Trump administration's immigration policies have faced significant legal challenges, including a federal judge blocking an executive order aimed at ending birthright citizenship [2][3] - The administration's actions have prompted lawsuits from affected individuals and institutions, highlighting the contentious nature of its immigration reforms [3][5] Education Sector - The Trump administration's cancellation of visas for international students has resulted in lawsuits from affected students and institutions, indicating a significant conflict between the administration and the higher education sector [3][5] - Harvard University has also filed a lawsuit against the administration, reflecting the ongoing struggle between educational institutions and government policies [3][5] Political Climate - The increasing number of lawsuits against the Trump administration is seen as a manifestation of the escalating partisan conflict within the U.S. political system [5][6] - The ongoing legal disputes are contributing to a perception of chaos within the government, with public protests and declining approval ratings for the Trump administration [6]