Core Viewpoint - Trump's statement indicates a significant threat to federal funding for New York City if Democratic candidate Mamdani wins the upcoming mayoral election, emphasizing that his administration would provide "almost no" additional federal funds beyond the legal minimum [1][3]. Group 1: Political Context - Trump labels Mamdani as a "communist candidate," predicting that under his leadership, New York City would face "total economic collapse and social disaster," urging his supporters to vote for former Governor Cuomo, who is running as an independent [3]. - Mamdani's proposals include raising taxes on the wealthy, increasing corporate taxes, freezing rent for stabilized apartments, and boosting public housing subsidies, which have energized young and progressive voters but raised concerns among moderate Democrats and the financial sector [3]. Group 2: Federal Funding Implications - Federal funding is crucial for New York City, with the federal government planning to allocate approximately $7.4 billion for the fiscal year 2026, accounting for 6.4% of the city's total expenditures. Trump's threat could have profound effects on public services and infrastructure development in the city [3]. - Prior to Trump's threat, New York State was already facing a crisis due to a political stalemate in the federal government, leading to a depletion of funds for the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, which assists about one-eighth of Americans in purchasing food [4]. Group 3: Political Polarization - Trump's intervention in the New York City mayoral election reflects the increasing polarization in American politics, framing the election as a battle between "successful Democrats" and "communists," and utilizing his TruthSocial platform to mobilize voters [4].

Core Viewpoint - Elon Musk has announced the formation of a new political party called the "American Party," aiming to challenge the existing two-party system in the U.S. This initiative is seen as a response to the perceived waste and corruption within the current political framework [1][3]. Group 1: Political Context - Musk's announcement comes amid increasing political polarization in the U.S., which is expected to lead to long-term instability [3]. - Musk has previously been a significant supporter of Trump, contributing $277 million to his campaign and forming a controversial "Department of Government Efficiency" aimed at reducing federal spending [3][4]. - The relationship between Musk and Trump has soured, particularly after Musk criticized Trump's "Big and Beautiful" plan, which is projected to increase national debt by $4.1 trillion by 2034 [3][4]. Group 2: Formation of the American Party - Musk hinted at forming a new party due to the debt burden imposed by the "Big and Beautiful" plan, stating it is time for a party that genuinely cares for the people [4]. - On July 4, Musk conducted a poll on social media regarding the establishment of the "American Party," which garnered over 1.2 million votes, with 65.4% in favor [4][6]. - Although Musk has not released a complete party platform, he confirmed key policy positions, including debt reduction, responsible spending, and support for AI and technology [6]. Group 3: Challenges Ahead - The U.S. electoral system, characterized by a "winner-takes-all" approach, poses significant challenges for third-party candidates, making it difficult for them to gain traction [7][8]. - New parties face stringent requirements to appear on ballots, including collecting a substantial number of signatures, which can be daunting [8]. - Financial backing is crucial for establishing a new party, and despite Musk's wealth, previous attempts to influence elections have not always been successful, indicating that money alone may not suffice [9].

2025.06. 18 本文字数：2512，阅读时长大约4分钟 作者 | 第一财经 受美国政府关税政策严重影响的美国企业已按捺不住，最终将其贸易政策直接诉至美国最高法院，要 求进行司法审查。 当地时间6月17日，美国伊利诺伊州两家教育类玩具销售企业向美国最高法院递交紧急请愿，要求对 特朗普政府4月2日依据《国际经济紧急权力法》（IEEPA）实施的关税措施进行合宪性审查。 此案此前已在美国华盛顿地方法院获得阶段性胜利，特朗普政府随即提起上诉。尽管法律界普遍预期 该案最终将诉至最高法院，但按美国常规司法程序，此案应先行通过上诉法院审理。但原告方在提交 的文件中强调，本案"涉及至关重要且紧迫的法律问题"，主张最高法院应在上诉法院之前直接介入。 根据美国耶鲁大学预算实验室的数据，当前美国消费者面临的总体平均有效关税税率为21.9%，为 1909年以来最高。 新宏睿投资管理公司创始人兼董事总经理夏宇宸对第一财经记者表示，自4月2日以来，特朗普政府 的一系列政策已经对美国国内外的企业与投资者的信心产生不可逆转的影响。 "虽然难以判断特朗普剩余任期中依旧存在的政策风险，但可以清晰地感受到美国政府的政策正从调 节市场的角色逐 ...