Core Viewpoint - The article critiques the misinterpretation of China's academic journal evaluation system by an overseas publication, emphasizing the need for careful discernment by scholars and policymakers regarding the motivations behind the criticisms [1][2][4]. Group 1: Misinterpretation of Facts - The increase in the proportion of Chinese scholars leaving the country is inaccurately attributed to China's journal evaluation system, while the actual reasons are linked to specific policies from certain Western countries [1] - The current academic evaluation practices in China, including journal classification, are seen as attractive to overseas scholars, contrasting with the increasing pressures faced by researchers in the U.S. [1] Group 2: Oversight of Root Causes - The article argues that the issues within the research evaluation system should not be simplistically blamed on a single Chinese institution's journal classification system, as it overlooks the broader international academic environment influenced by Western commercial entities [2] - Over-reliance on metrics like the SCI impact factor has detrimental effects on the international research ecosystem, leading to unhealthy competition and the emergence of fraudulent practices [2] Group 3: Need for Independent Reform - There is a call for the establishment of an independent Chinese journal system and evaluation mechanism, advocating for continuous improvement and diversification in academic evaluation practices [3] - The article warns against the potential pitfalls of relying on opaque foreign commercial entities for academic evaluation, which could lead to significant financial and intellectual losses for Chinese researchers [3] Group 4: Global Academic Community and Economic Context - The article highlights the necessity for global scientific collaboration and awareness against the commodification of academic evaluation tools that threaten research integrity [4] - It points out that some countries are unfairly blaming China for their own economic challenges, while China's advancements in research benefit the global scientific community [4][5]