Core Viewpoint - The public fallout between actress Zhao Lusi and her management company, Galaxy Cool Entertainment, highlights the ongoing power struggles and issues of artist autonomy within the entertainment industry, revealing the often-overlooked pressures faced by artists [4][6][23]. Group 1: Incident Overview - On August 2, 2025, Zhao Lusi publicly accused Galaxy Cool Entertainment of financial misconduct and lack of communication regarding her work and health issues, leading to a significant media uproar [4][6]. - Zhao Lusi's accusations included claims of being forced to bear financial losses from canceled endorsements due to her health and being threatened with a potential ban from the industry [6][7]. - The conflict escalated with both parties exchanging statements, with Galaxy Cool emphasizing their commitment to Zhao's well-being while Zhao expressed her frustration over the lack of support and communication [9][11]. Group 2: Background on Zhao Lusi - Zhao Lusi, who debuted in 2016, rose to prominence with hit dramas such as "The Rumored Chen Qianqian," which garnered over 2 billion views, significantly boosting her and the company's profile [15][19]. - Despite her success, tensions arose over resource allocation, with fans accusing Galaxy Cool of mismanaging profits from her projects and failing to support her during critical times [15][22]. - Zhao's mental health struggles, including a diagnosis of severe depression, have been linked to her experiences within the industry, including a violent incident in 2019 that contributed to her psychological distress [16][17]. Group 3: Company Dynamics - Galaxy Cool Entertainment, founded in 2015, has faced challenges in maintaining a balanced roster of talent, with 80% of its resources concentrated on Zhao Lusi, creating a "one strong, many weak" structure [19][22]. - The company has experienced financial difficulties, particularly after the decline in popularity of its flagship show "Mars Intelligence Agency," leading to a reliance on Zhao Lusi's success [19][20]. - The ongoing conflict with Zhao Lusi has exposed vulnerabilities in the company's operational model, raising concerns about its future viability and the treatment of its artists [22][23].

Core Viewpoint - The public fallout between actress Zhao Lusi and her management company, Galaxy Cool Entertainment, highlights the ongoing power struggles and issues of artist autonomy and mental health within the entertainment industry [1][2][22]. Group 1: Incident Overview - On August 2, 2025, Zhao Lusi publicly accused Galaxy Cool Entertainment of financial misconduct and lack of communication regarding her health and work situation, leading to a significant public outcry [1][2]. - Zhao Lusi revealed her struggles with severe anxiety and depression, indicating that her mental health issues were exacerbated by her experiences with the company [2][5][11]. - The company responded to her accusations, expressing shock and emphasizing their commitment to her well-being, but the relationship between Zhao Lusi and the company deteriorated further [2][4]. Group 2: Company Background - Galaxy Cool Entertainment, founded in 2015, has focused on internet video content development and has seen significant success with shows like "Mars Intelligence Agency," which garnered over 3.4 billion views across its first three seasons [15][16]. - The company has faced challenges, including a decline in the popularity of its flagship show and financial losses in 2018-2019, leading to a reliance on Zhao Lusi's success to stabilize its operations [19][20]. - The company has been criticized for its management structure, which heavily relies on a single artist, Zhao Lusi, creating an imbalanced resource allocation that has become vulnerable amid her health crisis [20][21]. Group 3: Industry Implications - The conflict between Zhao Lusi and Galaxy Cool Entertainment reflects broader issues in the entertainment industry, such as the treatment of artists, contract disputes, and the mental health challenges faced by performers [21][22]. - The potential for a lengthy legal battle over contract disputes, including an estimated 400 million yuan in termination fees, raises concerns about the future of artist-management relationships in the industry [21][22]. - The incident has sparked discussions about the need for better protections for artists' rights and mental health within the entertainment sector [12][21].