公告称，收入增加主要由于艺人管理产生的收入增加。艺人管理业务产生的收入由截至2024年6月30日 止六个月的3.03亿元增加17.7%至报告期间的3.57亿元，主要由于报告期间集团旗下签约艺人参加的商 业活动数量增加。 凭借集团完善且专业的艺人管理体系，集团一直为签约艺人及训练生开拓多元化的职业道路及培训计 划。截至2025年6月30日，集团有62名签约艺人及51名参加集团训练生计划的训练生。凭借其良好的公 众形象和知名度，集团的签约艺人在多项热门作品中扮演重要角色，如电影《向阳•花》，剧集《五福 临门》及《淮水竹亭》，以及综艺节目《是女儿是妈妈2》、《风驰赛车手》及《乘风2025》。 集团亦致力于发展集团的音乐IP制作及运营业务。于报告期间，集团成功发行11首数字单曲及3张数字 专辑，涵盖多种曲风，获得广泛人气。 乐华娱乐(02306)发布截至2025年6月30日止六个月中期业绩，收入4.14亿元(人民币，下同)，同比增加 19.28%;股东应占溢利5809.9万元，同比增加88.66%;每股基本盈利0.07元。 ...

凭借集团完善且专业的艺人管理体系，集团一直为签约艺人及训练生开拓多元化的职业道路及培训计 划。截至2025年6月30日，集团有62名签约艺人及51名参加集团训练生计划的训练生。凭借其良好的公 众形象和知名度，集团的签约艺人在多项热门作品中扮演重要角色，如电影《向阳花》，剧集《五福临 门》及《淮水竹亭》，以及综艺节目《是女儿是妈妈2》、《风驰赛车手》及《乘风2025》。 集团亦致力于发展集团的音乐IP制作及运营业务。于报告期间，集团成功发行11首数字单曲及3张数字 专辑，涵盖多种曲风，获得广泛人气。 乐华娱乐(02306)发布截至2025年6月30日止六个月中期业绩，收入4.14亿元(人民币，下同)，同比增加 19.28%;股东应占溢利5809.9万元，同比增加88.66%;每股基本盈利0.07元。 公告称，收入增加主要由于艺人管理产生的收入增加。艺人管理业务产生的收入由截至2024年6月30日 止六个月的3.03亿元增加17.7%至报告期间的3.57亿元，主要由于报告期间集团旗下签约艺人参加的商 业活动数量增加。 ...

报告期间录得利润人民币61.1百万元，而于截至2024年6月30日止六个月则为利润人民币29.4百万元，主 要由于报告期间以权益结算的股份支付减少及艺人管理业务产生的收入增加。 格隆汇8月25日丨乐华娱乐(02306.HK)公告，截至2025年6月30日止六个月，公司总收入由截至2024年6 月30日止六个月的人民币347.3百万元增加至报告期间的人民币414.2百万元，同比增长19.3%，主要由 于艺人管理产生的收入增加。 ...

现在点开赵露思的微博，已经显示"该账号因用户自行申请关闭，现已无法查看"。 这是一场事先张扬的离开。赵露思在直播间早就预告过，正式走完注销流程后，她也第一时间分享了告别感言："太开心了，不喜欢我的人离我远一点， 从此以后再也不会有人说我买热搜。" 告别微博=告别热搜、告别"有人说"，如果这就是赵露思的设想，恐怕要失望了。中场有战事，流量无终局，只要她还在社交媒体活跃，还没有离开内 娱，即便退到"网红"的位置，依然要面对"不被爱"的可能性，依然会听到褒贬不一的声音，依然将活在大众的注视里。 这不是个人的困境，而是传播的必然。 从公开讨伐公司到彻底放飞自我，再到注销微博账号，赵露思一波接一波的操作让很多人联想到了郑爽。在熟龄人群看来，她们都一样幼稚自我，努力倾 诉、想"被偏爱"、最终在自觉勇敢的战斗中走上岔路——不是跟经纪公司闹解约么，怎么闹成"排除异己"、闭目塞听了？ 失控的舆论，个人的选择 在公开讨伐经纪公司的半个多月里，被舆论裹挟的赵露思也坐上了大众观感的过山车。 8月2日，她一声"不用你们封杀我，我不干了！"激起千层浪，将一段顶流明星和经纪公司的尴尬关系暴露在公众面前，一度掀起了行业内外对艺人经纪的 广泛 ...

消息面上，乐华娱乐近日发布盈喜，集团预期于截至2025年6月30日止六个月将取得股东应占净利润介 于约人民币5000万元至7000万元，较截至2024年6月30日止六个月约人民币3080万元增加约62.3%至 127.3%。董事会认为，股东应占净利润的有关增加乃主要由于有关期间以权益结算的股份支付减少； 及有关期间艺人管理业务产生的收入增加。 乐华娱乐(02306)涨超8%，截至发稿，涨8.18%，报2.38港元，成交额1044.07万港元。 ...

Core Viewpoint - The public fallout between actress Zhao Lusi and her management company, Galaxy Cool Entertainment, highlights the ongoing power struggles and issues of artist autonomy within the entertainment industry, revealing the often-overlooked pressures faced by artists [4][6][23]. Group 1: Incident Overview - On August 2, 2025, Zhao Lusi publicly accused Galaxy Cool Entertainment of financial misconduct and lack of communication regarding her work and health issues, leading to a significant media uproar [4][6]. - Zhao Lusi's accusations included claims of being forced to bear financial losses from canceled endorsements due to her health and being threatened with a potential ban from the industry [6][7]. - The conflict escalated with both parties exchanging statements, with Galaxy Cool emphasizing their commitment to Zhao's well-being while Zhao expressed her frustration over the lack of support and communication [9][11]. Group 2: Background on Zhao Lusi - Zhao Lusi, who debuted in 2016, rose to prominence with hit dramas such as "The Rumored Chen Qianqian," which garnered over 2 billion views, significantly boosting her and the company's profile [15][19]. - Despite her success, tensions arose over resource allocation, with fans accusing Galaxy Cool of mismanaging profits from her projects and failing to support her during critical times [15][22]. - Zhao's mental health struggles, including a diagnosis of severe depression, have been linked to her experiences within the industry, including a violent incident in 2019 that contributed to her psychological distress [16][17]. Group 3: Company Dynamics - Galaxy Cool Entertainment, founded in 2015, has faced challenges in maintaining a balanced roster of talent, with 80% of its resources concentrated on Zhao Lusi, creating a "one strong, many weak" structure [19][22]. - The company has experienced financial difficulties, particularly after the decline in popularity of its flagship show "Mars Intelligence Agency," leading to a reliance on Zhao Lusi's success [19][20]. - The ongoing conflict with Zhao Lusi has exposed vulnerabilities in the company's operational model, raising concerns about its future viability and the treatment of its artists [22][23].

Core Viewpoint - The conflict between Zhao Lusi and her agency, Galaxy Cool Entertainment, has escalated, with Zhao accusing the agency of financial misconduct and neglecting her mental health during her treatment for severe anxiety and depression [1][4][5]. Group 1: Zhao Lusi's Allegations - Zhao Lusi claims that Galaxy Cool Entertainment deducted 2.05 million yuan from her studio account for canceled endorsements, despite the agency's prior commitment to cover these losses [1][6]. - She has expressed frustration over the agency's failure to resolve issues related to her work and the lack of support from her team during her health struggles [1][6]. - Zhao has indicated that she will escalate the matter to the police if a resolution is not reached [1]. Group 2: Galaxy Cool Entertainment's Response - Galaxy Cool Entertainment responded by stating they were shocked by Zhao's allegations and denied any wrongdoing, emphasizing their concern for her health and well-being [4][5]. - The agency highlighted that they have been under significant pressure and have made efforts to minimize negative impacts while respecting Zhao's reasonable requests [4][5]. - They urged Zhao to refrain from making vague public statements that could mislead the public [4]. Group 3: Legal and Operational Implications - Legal experts suggest that if Galaxy Cool Entertainment claims the deduction was for endorsement losses, they must prove a direct causal relationship between Zhao's actions and the financial losses incurred [6]. - The operational dynamics between Zhao and the agency are under scrutiny, particularly regarding the management of her studio and the distribution of staff responsibilities [7]. - The ongoing conflict reflects deeper issues within the entertainment industry regarding artist management and agency relationships, especially as artists gain more leverage in negotiations [14][16]. Group 4: Historical Context and Industry Dynamics - The relationship between Zhao Lusi and Galaxy Cool Entertainment has been strained for some time, with Zhao previously disclosing her struggles with depression linked to past incidents with the agency [9][10]. - Galaxy Cool Entertainment has historically relied on Zhao as a key asset, particularly in their transition to focusing on talent management amid changing market conditions [10][11]. - The agency's connection to larger entities like Alibaba has been noted, but the depth of this relationship is questioned, especially after recent changes in ownership and partnerships [11][12].

Core Viewpoint - The conflict between Zhao Lusi and her agency, Galaxy Cool Entertainment, has escalated, with Zhao accusing the agency of financial misconduct and lack of support during her health struggles [1][5][8]. Group 1: Conflict Details - Zhao Lusi publicly accused Galaxy Cool Entertainment of withdrawing 2.05 million yuan from her studio account for canceled endorsements, despite promises to cover these losses [1][8]. - Zhao expressed her frustration over the agency's failure to resolve issues related to her work studio and the lack of communication from the agency during her health crisis [6][8]. - Galaxy Cool Entertainment responded by denying any wrongdoing and emphasized their commitment to Zhao's well-being, urging her to refrain from making vague public statements that could mislead the public [5][8]. Group 2: Background and Context - The relationship between Zhao Lusi and Galaxy Cool Entertainment has been strained for a long time, with Zhao revealing her struggles with depression dating back to 2019, which she attributes to various pressures, including alleged mistreatment by agency personnel [9][10]. - Galaxy Cool Entertainment has relied heavily on Zhao Lusi as their primary artist, with her involvement in several key projects, including popular variety shows and dramas [11][12]. - The agency's financial model has been challenged by changing market conditions, leading them to focus more on artist management, with Zhao being a pivotal figure in their strategy [12][18]. Group 3: Industry Dynamics - The entertainment industry is experiencing a shift in power dynamics, with artists gaining more influence over their careers, which poses challenges for management companies [21][22]. - The rise of digital platforms has altered the traditional artist-management relationship, making it more complex as artists seek greater autonomy and control over their projects [22][23]. - The current situation highlights the need for a reevaluation of artist contracts and management practices in the evolving entertainment landscape [25].

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the shift in the entertainment industry where production companies are increasingly venturing into talent management, particularly focusing on younger actors, amidst a challenging market environment for traditional talent agencies and production houses [1][5][20]. Group 1: Industry Trends - Production companies like Zhengwu Sunshine are re-entering the talent management space, previously abandoned eight years ago, indicating a strategic pivot in response to market pressures [1][5]. - Major production companies are signing a significant number of young actors, referred to as "00 flowers," to bolster their talent pools and maintain competitive advantages in casting [3][11]. - The decline of traditional casting agencies has prompted production companies to take control of talent management to secure their casting choices and reduce reliance on external agencies [5][7]. Group 2: Financial Pressures - The profitability of production companies is under pressure, with reports indicating a nearly 50% drop in revenue from long-form drama licensing rights, highlighting the need for diversification into talent management [5][11]. - Companies like Chengmeng reported a decrease in revenue from 11.38 billion to 5.91 billion, emphasizing the financial challenges faced by the industry [5][11]. Group 3: Talent Management Strategies - The article notes a trend where production companies are not only signing new talent but also established actors, creating a diverse roster that can appeal to various audience segments [11][12]. - The rise of group dramas has created opportunities for new actors to shine, making it an attractive avenue for production companies to invest in fresh talent [11][20]. - Headlining actors are being targeted by new management companies, indicating a competitive landscape where established names are also being sought after for their marketability [12][14]. Group 4: Platform Influence - Video platforms are playing a crucial role in shaping talent management strategies, with companies leveraging their resources to promote their own signed artists [20][24]. - The article highlights that platforms like Tencent and iQIYI are actively involved in talent management, often prioritizing their own signed artists for key roles in productions [20][24]. - The success of platform-backed artists is being closely monitored, as their performance can significantly impact the platforms' investment decisions in talent [20][24].

Core Viewpoint - Beijing Dawan Entertainment Culture Media Co., Ltd. has undergone significant changes in ownership and management, with implications for its future operations and artist contracts [1] Group 1: Company Changes - The original shareholder, Sanya Wenyi Xiaohong Culture Media Co., Ltd., has exited the company, and the original supervisor has resigned [1] - Jia Ling (real name: Jia Yuling) now holds 100% ownership of Beijing Dawan Entertainment, with her father, Jia Wentian, serving as the legal representative, manager, director, and financial officer [1] Group 2: Business Adjustments - In September 2024, Dawan Entertainment announced a major business adjustment, with Jia Ling stepping down from her position in the company [1] - The contracts of artists under her management, including Zhang Xiaofei and Xu Juncong, will not be renewed upon expiration, indicating a shift in the company's artist management strategy [1]