Core Viewpoint - The article highlights the increasing trend of strict regulatory measures against listed companies involved in serious violations, leading to forced delisting and criminal penalties for key offenders [2][10][12]. Group 1: Forced Delisting - On July 25, Jinzhou Port will be delisted due to serious violations, marking it as another company facing forced delisting [2]. - Since early 2025, nine companies have entered the delisting process due to serious violations, including Zhuolang Technology and Puli Pharmaceutical [11]. - The regulatory focus on serious violations for forced delisting has intensified, with the new policies established in April 2024 and July 2025 reinforcing this trend [10][11]. Group 2: Criminal Penalties - The regulatory environment has shifted towards a "three penalties linkage" approach, combining administrative, civil, and criminal penalties for serious violators [5][8]. - Companies like Jintongling and Ruiskanda have faced criminal charges after administrative and civil penalties, indicating a clear escalation in regulatory actions [6][8]. - The number of companies facing criminal penalties has increased significantly, with over ten companies experiencing criminal measures since early 2025 [7][8]. Group 3: Accountability of Third Parties - The regulatory body has begun to impose penalties on third parties involved in financial fraud, as seen in the Yuebo Power case where accomplices were fined [3][15]. - The trend of holding third parties accountable reflects a broader strategy to dismantle the networks that facilitate financial fraud in the capital market [15]. Group 4: Investor Protection - Regulatory measures are being enhanced to protect investors affected by fraudulent activities, including civil compensation initiatives [16]. - The introduction of advance compensation and commitments from administrative enforcement parties aims to provide timely restitution to investors [16].

Core Viewpoint - The article highlights the increasing trend of forced delisting of companies due to serious violations, particularly following the implementation of new regulations and stricter enforcement measures in the Chinese capital market [1][7][8]. Group 1: Forced Delisting Trends - Jinzhou Port has been forced to delist due to significant violations, marking it as another company subjected to this regulatory action [1]. - Since the beginning of 2025, nine companies have entered the delisting process due to serious violations, including Zhuolang Technology and Puli Pharmaceutical [8]. - The new "National Nine Articles" and subsequent regulations have laid a foundation for the strict enforcement of delisting policies, particularly targeting companies with severe misconduct [7][8]. Group 2: Criminal Penalties and Enforcement - The regulatory environment has shifted towards a "three penalties linkage" approach, combining administrative, civil, and criminal penalties for serious violations [3][4]. - Companies like Jintongling and Ruiskanda have faced criminal charges following administrative and civil penalties, illustrating the new enforcement trend [4][6]. - The number of companies facing criminal penalties has significantly increased, with over ten companies involved since early 2025 [2][6]. Group 3: Accountability of Third Parties - Regulatory bodies are intensifying penalties against third parties involved in financial fraud, as seen in the case of Yuebo Power, where accomplices were also penalized [2][11]. - The trend of holding third parties accountable reflects a broader strategy to dismantle the networks that facilitate financial misconduct in the capital market [11]. Group 4: Investor Protection Measures - There is a growing emphasis on protecting investors affected by corporate fraud, with measures such as civil compensation being initiated in cases of information disclosure violations [12][13]. - Recent guidelines have been established to support timely compensation for investors, enhancing the accountability of responsible parties [13].