转自：法治日报 □ 本报记者 王春 □ 本报通讯员 连琦琦 作为"温州模式"的重要发祥地，浙江省乐清市汇聚了25万余 户市场经营主体，民营企业数量占比超97%。 在这片创新创业的热土上，民营经济的脉动始终与城市 发展同频共振。 "法治是最好的营商环境。"2025年以来，乐清市人民法院紧扣生产、知产、破产三大 关键环节，扎实开展民营企业"三产"司法护航专项行动，共办结涉企案件12415件，执行到位金额42.4 亿元。以覆盖企业"全生命周期"的司法服务，持续优化法治化营商环境，为民营经济高质量发展注入强 劲司法动能。 助企业纾困解难 "什么叫无讼企业？""评上无讼企业有什么好处？"前不久，在乐清法院"无讼企业"工作的动员现场，多 家企业踊跃发问。 为从源头降低涉企纠纷数量，乐清法院自2023年起推行"无讼企业"创建活动，通过 常态化走访企业、开展"问需于企"专项普法活动、制发法律风险提示等，助力企业强化自检自治能力。 已累计走访企业193家，开展座谈11场，收集并回应企业问题71条。 与此同时，乐清法院引入商会力量 参与涉企纠纷化解，自2019年起，在各省市乐清商会设立共享法庭59家，持续擦亮"商事纠纷商会解"品 ...

大连海事法院成立于1984年，管辖案件范围包含海事海商与海事行政案件。今年以来，大连海事法 院积极推进海事刑事、民事、行政审判"三审合一"改革试点工作，一方面积极组建刑事审判团队，另一 方面积极与相关部门沟通协调，搭建起与检察机关、海警部门的"侦、诉、审"衔接机制，为深化试点工 作奠定良好基础。（李慧） 来源：人民法院报 2024年11月1日，某外籍钢制散货轮船从辽宁省营口市鲅鱼圈港装载钢材驶往天津港。11月2日清 晨，卡某与马某值班期间，卡某未认真履行驾驶职责，违反规定在驾驶室后侧海图室编写离港报告，授 权无驾驶资格的马某独自操纵船舶。该外轮航经大连长兴岛经济技术开发区附近海域时，与某中国籍钢 制流刺网渔船形成对遇局面，发生碰撞，造成中国籍渔船翻扣，船上船员二人死亡、七人失踪。经辽宁 海事局调查认定，该外轮应承担事故主要责任，两被告人作为值班驾驶员和值班水手是事故的直接责任 人。大连市人民检察院以交通肇事罪对卡某、马某提起公诉。 法院审理后认为，被告人卡某、马某的行为均已构成交通肇事罪，情节特别恶劣，应依法惩处。卡 某在交通事故发生后，为逃避法律追究驾驶船舶离开，构成交通运输肇事后逃逸。鉴于二被告人系过失 ...

Core Viewpoint - The article highlights the increasing trend of strict regulatory measures against listed companies involved in serious violations, leading to forced delisting and criminal penalties for key offenders [2][10][12]. Group 1: Forced Delisting - On July 25, Jinzhou Port will be delisted due to serious violations, marking it as another company facing forced delisting [2]. - Since early 2025, nine companies have entered the delisting process due to serious violations, including Zhuolang Technology and Puli Pharmaceutical [11]. - The regulatory focus on serious violations for forced delisting has intensified, with the new policies established in April 2024 and July 2025 reinforcing this trend [10][11]. Group 2: Criminal Penalties - The regulatory environment has shifted towards a "three penalties linkage" approach, combining administrative, civil, and criminal penalties for serious violators [5][8]. - Companies like Jintongling and Ruiskanda have faced criminal charges after administrative and civil penalties, indicating a clear escalation in regulatory actions [6][8]. - The number of companies facing criminal penalties has increased significantly, with over ten companies experiencing criminal measures since early 2025 [7][8]. Group 3: Accountability of Third Parties - The regulatory body has begun to impose penalties on third parties involved in financial fraud, as seen in the Yuebo Power case where accomplices were fined [3][15]. - The trend of holding third parties accountable reflects a broader strategy to dismantle the networks that facilitate financial fraud in the capital market [15]. Group 4: Investor Protection - Regulatory measures are being enhanced to protect investors affected by fraudulent activities, including civil compensation initiatives [16]. - The introduction of advance compensation and commitments from administrative enforcement parties aims to provide timely restitution to investors [16].

Core Viewpoint - The article highlights the increasing trend of forced delisting of companies due to serious violations, particularly following the implementation of new regulations and stricter enforcement measures in the Chinese capital market [1][7][8]. Group 1: Forced Delisting Trends - Jinzhou Port has been forced to delist due to significant violations, marking it as another company subjected to this regulatory action [1]. - Since the beginning of 2025, nine companies have entered the delisting process due to serious violations, including Zhuolang Technology and Puli Pharmaceutical [8]. - The new "National Nine Articles" and subsequent regulations have laid a foundation for the strict enforcement of delisting policies, particularly targeting companies with severe misconduct [7][8]. Group 2: Criminal Penalties and Enforcement - The regulatory environment has shifted towards a "three penalties linkage" approach, combining administrative, civil, and criminal penalties for serious violations [3][4]. - Companies like Jintongling and Ruiskanda have faced criminal charges following administrative and civil penalties, illustrating the new enforcement trend [4][6]. - The number of companies facing criminal penalties has significantly increased, with over ten companies involved since early 2025 [2][6]. Group 3: Accountability of Third Parties - Regulatory bodies are intensifying penalties against third parties involved in financial fraud, as seen in the case of Yuebo Power, where accomplices were also penalized [2][11]. - The trend of holding third parties accountable reflects a broader strategy to dismantle the networks that facilitate financial misconduct in the capital market [11]. Group 4: Investor Protection Measures - There is a growing emphasis on protecting investors affected by corporate fraud, with measures such as civil compensation being initiated in cases of information disclosure violations [12][13]. - Recent guidelines have been established to support timely compensation for investors, enhancing the accountability of responsible parties [13].