Group 1 - The central task of the government is to conduct a special action for the centralized rectification of administrative law enforcement related to enterprises, which is crucial for building a law-based business environment and promoting high-quality development [1] - Administrative law enforcement should be based on legal provisions, strictly regulated, fair, civilized, and efficient, ensuring that penalties are applied according to the laws in effect at the time of the violation, reflecting the principle of not retroactively applying laws [1][3] - The principle of leniency in administrative penalties is emphasized, allowing for the application of lighter penalties if laws or regulations have changed since the violation occurred [1] Group 2 - Local governments have introduced lists of environmental violations that will not incur penalties or will receive reduced penalties, promoting proactive measures rather than reactive enforcement [2] - The focus should be on preemptive guidance for enterprises, helping them understand which behaviors will not lead to penalties, thereby enhancing their sense of a favorable business environment [2] Group 3 - The "Three-Year Action Plan to Improve Administrative Law Enforcement Quality (2023-2025)" highlights the need to enhance the effectiveness of administrative inspections and ensure that enforcement aligns with the evolving economic and social development needs [3] - There is a call to broaden the types of administrative enforcement beyond a few common violations, ensuring that more legal requirements are effectively enforced [3] Group 4 - Emphasis is placed on preventive measures in environmental law enforcement, with a focus on educating enterprises about legal requirements to avoid violations [4] - The integration of digital technology in enforcement is encouraged, allowing for more precise and efficient monitoring of pollution sources and enabling real-time alerts for enterprises [4]