表决程序及结果的合法性

Search documents
XD宁波富: 宁波富邦精业集团股份有限公司2025年第二次临时股东会的法律意见书
Zheng Quan Zhi Xing· 2025-08-11 16:16
杭州市上城区新业路 8 号华联时代大厦 B 幢 22 层 电话:0571-88362156 传真:0571-88362156 邮编:310016 北京国枫(杭州)律师事务所 关于宁波富邦精业集团股份有限公司 北京国枫(杭州)律师事务所(以下简称"本所")接受贵公司的委托,指派律 师出席并见证贵公司 2025 年第二次临时股东会(以下简称"本次会议")。 本所律师根据《中华人民共和国公司法》(以下简称"《公司法》")、《中华 人民共和国证券法》(以下简称"《证券法》")、《上市公司股东会规则》(以下 简称"《股东会规则》")、《律师事务所从事证券法律业务管理办法》(以下简称 "《证券法律业务管理办法》")、《律师事务所证券法律业务执业规则(试行)》 (以下简称"《证券法律业务执业规则》")等相关法律、行政法规、规章、规范性 文件及《宁波富邦精业集团股份有限公司章程》(以下简称"《公司章程》")的规 定,就本次会议的召集与召开程序、召集人资格、出席会议人员资格、会议表决程序 及表决结果等事宜,出具本法律意见书。 对本法律意见书的出具,本所律师特作如下声明: 会议表决程序及表决结果的合法性发表意见,不对本次会议所审 ...
万润股份: 上海市方达(北京)律师事务所关于中节能万润股份有限公司2025年第一次临时股东大会的法律意见书
Zheng Quan Zhi Xing· 2025-07-02 16:27
Core Viewpoint - The legal opinion letter confirms that the procedures for convening and holding the 2025 first extraordinary general meeting of shareholders of China Energy Conservation and Environmental Protection Group Co., Ltd. comply with relevant Chinese laws and regulations as well as the company's articles of association [1][3][6]. Group 1: Meeting Procedures - The notice for the meeting was published on June 13, 2025, on the Shenzhen Stock Exchange website, meeting the requirement of more than 15 days' notice [3][4]. - The meeting utilized a combination of on-site and online voting, with specific time slots for online voting on July 2, 2025 [3][4]. Group 2: Voting Participation and Qualifications - A total of 9 shareholders participated in the on-site voting, representing 245,692,619 shares, which is 26.4194% of the total voting shares [4][5]. - The overall participation included 411 shareholders, representing 399,788,007 shares, or 42.9894% of the total voting shares [4][5]. Group 3: Voting Results - The proposal to elect non-independent directors received 398,988,657 votes in favor, accounting for 99.8001% of the votes cast [5][6]. - The voting results from minority investors showed 41,838,880 votes in favor, which is 98.1253% of the votes from minority shareholders [6]. Group 4: Conclusion - The legal opinion concludes that the meeting's convening, voting participation, and results are all in compliance with Chinese laws and the company's articles of association, confirming the legality and validity of the proceedings [6].