Core Viewpoint - The article emphasizes the importance of reducing bureaucratic burdens at the grassroots level, highlighting the ongoing efforts and achievements in combating formalism within the governance structure [3][4]. Summary by Sections Background and Importance - The re-release of the "Regulations on Reducing Burdens at the Grassroots Level" by the Central Government indicates a strong commitment to addressing formalism and its impact on grassroots governance [2][3]. - The success of these regulations is reflected in a survey where over 95% of respondents reported positive effects from the measures implemented [3]. Specific Measures - The regulations outline 21 specific measures aimed at reducing bureaucratic burdens, including the simplification of documents, meetings, and inspections, as well as clarifying responsibilities at the grassroots level [4][6]. - A key focus is on establishing clear responsibilities to prevent the overload of tasks that detract from primary duties, such as teaching in schools [6][7]. Implementation and Accountability - The regulations stress the need for a clear delineation of responsibilities to avoid overburdening grassroots entities with tasks outside their core functions [6][7]. - There is an emphasis on strengthening accountability for violations of these regulations, with a mechanism for reporting and addressing issues at various administrative levels [9]. Challenges and Obstacles - The article identifies two main obstacles to reducing formalism: the performance-driven mindset of higher authorities and the compliance mentality at the grassroots level [9]. - Addressing these issues is crucial for the successful implementation of the regulations and for fostering a more effective governance environment [9].

Core Points - The central government emphasizes the importance of reducing burdens on grassroots officials and maintaining long-term efforts in this area [1][2] - The "Several Regulations" introduced 21 specific measures aimed at reducing formalism and clarifying responsibilities at the grassroots level [2][4] - The issue of formalism is prevalent at the grassroots level, but its roots are not solely found there [3][8] Summary by Sections - **Regulatory Measures**: The regulations focus on streamlining documents, reducing meetings, and clarifying responsibilities to alleviate the burden on grassroots officials [2][4] - **Responsibility Clarity**: There is a need to establish clear responsibility lists to prevent grassroots officials from being overwhelmed by tasks outside their primary duties [4][5] - **Enforcement and Accountability**: The regulations stress the importance of accountability for violations, with a mechanism for reporting and addressing issues at various levels [7][8] - **Cultural Challenges**: The persistence of formalism is attributed to the performance consciousness of higher authorities and the compliance mentality of grassroots officials [8]