Workflow
证券投顾恶意代理维权
icon
Search documents
证券投顾行业退费额激增背后 恶意代理维权“黑产”化
Jing Ji Guan Cha Wang· 2025-07-06 11:00
Core Insights - The securities advisory industry is facing a significant increase in refund requests, with total refunds reaching 2.328 billion and 2.445 billion in 2022 and 2023 respectively, marking an over 80% increase from 1.348 billion in 2021 [3][5] - A substantial portion of these refunds, estimated at 30%-40%, is attributed to malicious agency claims, which are causing considerable disruption to the advisory sector [3][6] - The number of agency firms involved in securities advisory claims has surged to approximately 800, with expectations for further growth in 2023 [3][6] Industry Dynamics - The securities advisory industry has seen a dramatic increase in refund requests, with "abnormal refunds" now accounting for 30%-40% of total refunds, primarily driven by clients seeking full refunds after contract expiration [6][7] - The total complaints in the securities advisory sector exceeded 23,000 in 2023, a 400% increase from 2021, indicating a growing trend of client dissatisfaction and aggressive refund requests [8][9] - Many advisory firms are adopting a strategy of direct refunds to mitigate complaints, as high complaint volumes can lead to severe regulatory penalties, including a three-month suspension of new client acquisitions [8][9] Financial Implications - The securities advisory industry generated a net income of 5.44 billion in 2024, despite facing increasing refund pressures [5] - The total refund amount in 2023 reached 2.445 billion, with an estimated 30%-40% flowing to agency firms, suggesting that the agency claims business could generate around 290 million in revenue for these firms [10][11] - The abnormal refund claims are estimated to consume over 9 billion of the total refund amount, significantly impacting the industry's overall profitability, which was only 1.762 billion in the same year [11] Regulatory and Operational Challenges - The industry is grappling with the challenge of malicious agency claims, which are often facilitated by individuals posing as legal consultants to induce clients to file complaints against advisory firms [7][12] - Regulatory bodies are beginning to address the issue, with recent initiatives aimed at curbing the rise of malicious agency claims and improving the overall integrity of the financial advisory sector [12][14] - The complexity of prosecuting these malicious claims is heightened by the use of sophisticated tactics by agency firms to evade detection, including operating under multiple company names and utilizing online platforms for transactions [12][14]